179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19893527)
1. Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies.
Satterfield T; Kandlikar M; Beaudrie CE; Conti J; Herr Harthorn B
Nat Nanotechnol; 2009 Nov; 4(11):752-8. PubMed ID: 19893527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies and trust in stakeholders: a cross sectional study of public, academic, government and business attitudes.
Capon A; Gillespie J; Rolfe M; Smith W
BMC Public Health; 2015 Apr; 15():424. PubMed ID: 25928741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vulnerability and social justice as factors in emergent U.S. nanotechnology risk perceptions.
Conti J; Satterfield T; Harthorn BH
Risk Anal; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1734-48. PubMed ID: 21453374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom.
Pidgeon N; Harthorn BH; Bryant K; Rogers-Hayden T
Nat Nanotechnol; 2009 Feb; 4(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 19197310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fairness and nanotechnology concern.
McComas KA; Besley JC
Risk Anal; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1749-61. PubMed ID: 21883336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Public optimism towards nanomedicine.
Bottini M; Rosato N; Gloria F; Adanti S; Corradino N; Bergamaschi A; Magrini A
Int J Nanomedicine; 2011; 6():3473-85. PubMed ID: 22267931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attitudes and attitudinal ambivalence change towards nanotechnology applied to food production.
Fischer AR; van Dijk H; de Jonge J; Rowe G; Frewer LJ
Public Underst Sci; 2013 Oct; 22(7):817-31. PubMed ID: 23825237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of nanomaterials in dentistry: covariates of risk and benefit perceptions among dentists and dental hygienists in Norway.
Xenaki V; Costea DE; Marthinussen MC; Cimpan MR; Åstrøm AN
Acta Odontol Scand; 2020 Mar; 78(2):152-160. PubMed ID: 31561718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging.
Siegrist M; Stampfli N; Kastenholz H; Keller C
Appetite; 2008 Sep; 51(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 18406006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding public perceptions of benefits and risks of childhood vaccinations in the United States.
Song G
Risk Anal; 2014 Mar; 34(3):541-55. PubMed ID: 24033739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nanotechnology and society: the evolution of risk perceptions.
Kahan DM
Nat Nanotechnol; 2009 Nov; 4(11):705-6. PubMed ID: 19898518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Occupational safety and health's role in sustainable, responsible nanotechnology: gaps and needs.
Iavicoli S; Rondinone BM; Boccuni F
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2009 Jun; 28(6-7):433-43. PubMed ID: 19755456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: the influence of affect and trust.
Siegrist M; Cousin ME; Kastenholz H; Wiek A
Appetite; 2007 Sep; 49(2):459-66. PubMed ID: 17442455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nanotechnologies in agriculture and food - an overview of different fields of application, risk assessment and public perception.
Grobe A; Rissanen ME
Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric; 2012 Dec; 4(3):176-86. PubMed ID: 23013411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Value predispositions as perceptual filters: Comparing of public attitudes toward nanotechnology in the United States and Singapore.
Liang X; Ho SS; Brossard D; Xenos MA; Scheufele DA; Anderson AA; Hao X; He X
Public Underst Sci; 2015 Jul; 24(5):582-600. PubMed ID: 24292230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Expert views on regulatory preparedness for managing the risks of nanotechnologies.
Beaudrie CE; Satterfield T; Kandlikar M; Harthorn BH
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e80250. PubMed ID: 24244662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology.
Kahan DM; Braman D; Slovic P; Gastil J; Cohen G
Nat Nanotechnol; 2009 Feb; 4(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 19197308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nanotechnology in Dutch science cafés: Public risk perceptions contextualised.
Dijkstra AM; Critchley CR
Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):71-87. PubMed ID: 24812210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bottom-up risk regulation? How nanotechnology risk knowledge gaps challenge federal and state environmental agencies.
Powell MC; Griffin MP; Tai S
Environ Manage; 2008 Sep; 42(3):426-43. PubMed ID: 18543023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Envisioning emerging nanotechnologies: a three-year panel study of South Carolina citizens.
Priest S; Lane T; Greenhalgh T; Hand LJ; Kramer V
Risk Anal; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1718-33. PubMed ID: 21992651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
