These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19893964)
1. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models. Watanabe-Kanno GA; Abrão J; Miasiro Junior H; Sánchez-Ayala A; Lagravère MO Braz Oral Res; 2009; 23(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 19893964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton ratios using Bibliocast Cécile3 digital models. Watanabe-Kanno GA; Abrão J; Junior HM; Sánchez-Ayala A; Lagravère MO Int Orthod; 2010 Sep; 8(3):215-26. PubMed ID: 20739241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. Bootvong K; Liu Z; McGrath C; Hägg U; Wong RW; Bendeus M; Yeung S Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 20164126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and validity of measurements on digital study models and plaster models. Reuschl RP; Heuer W; Stiesch M; Wenzel D; Dittmer MP Eur J Orthod; 2016 Feb; 38(1):22-26. PubMed ID: 25724574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing the reliability and accuracy of clinical measurements using plaster model and the digital model system based on crowding severity. Liang YM; Rutchakitprakarn L; Kuang SH; Wu TY J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Sep; 81(9):842-847. PubMed ID: 29395944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses. Naidu D; Scott J; Ong D; Ho CT Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 20043542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning. Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity. Czarnota J; Hey J; Fuhrmann R J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26753549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are there differences between comparison methods used to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of digital models? Camardella LT; Breuning H; Vilella OV Dental Press J Orthod; 2017 Feb; 22(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 28444012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner. Camardella LT; Breuning H; de Vasconcellos Vilella O J Orofac Orthop; 2017 May; 78(3):211-220. PubMed ID: 28074260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements. Nouri M; Massudi R; Bagheban AA; Azimi S; Fereidooni F Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Santoro M; Galkin S; Teredesai M; Nicolay OF; Cangialosi TJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jul; 124(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 12867904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Stevens DR; Flores-Mir C; Nebbe B; Raboud DW; Heo G; Major PW Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):794-803. PubMed ID: 16769498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can the intra-examiner variability of Little's Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts? Dowling AH; Burns A; Macauley D; Garvey TM; Fleming GJ J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 24012518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Difference between manual and digital measurements of dental arches of orthodontic patients. Jiménez-Gayosso SI; Lara-Carrillo E; López-González S; Medina-Solís CE; Scougall-Vilchis RJ; Hernández-Martínez CT; Colomé-Ruiz GE; Escoffié-Ramirez M Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(22):e10887. PubMed ID: 29851810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions. Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The comparison analysis of the line measurements between plaster and virtual orthodontic 3D models]. Jedlińska A Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 19374240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis. Zhang F; Suh KJ; Lee KM PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157713. PubMed ID: 27304976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study. Cuperus AM; Harms MC; Rangel FA; Bronkhorst EM; Schols JG; Breuning KH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Sep; 142(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 22920696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]