243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19894216)
41. Equivalence of binormal likelihood-ratio and bi-chi-squared ROC curve models.
Hillis SL
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):2031-57. PubMed ID: 26608405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Measurement error and confidence intervals for ROC curves.
Tosteson TD; Buonaccorsi JP; Demidenko E; Wells WA
Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):409-16. PubMed ID: 16161800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Goodness-of-fit issues in ROC curve estimation.
Walsh SJ
Med Decis Making; 1999; 19(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 10231082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A model-based approach for making ecological inference from distance sampling data.
Johnson DS; Laake JL; Ver Hoef JM
Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):310-8. PubMed ID: 19459840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data.
Metz CE; Herman BA; Shen JH
Stat Med; 1998 May; 17(9):1033-53. PubMed ID: 9612889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Mixtures of receiver operating characteristic curves.
Gönen M
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jul; 20(7):831-7. PubMed ID: 23643788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Resampling techniques in the analysis of non-binormal ROC data.
Mossman D
Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 8544679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Interval estimation for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve when data are subject to error.
Li Y; Koval JJ; Donner A; Zou GY
Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2521-31. PubMed ID: 20684006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Using the mean-to-sigma ratio as a measure of the improperness of binormal ROC curves.
Hillis SL; Berbaum KS
Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 21232682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Regularized binormal ROC method in disease classification using microarray data.
Ma S; Song X; Huang J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 May; 7():253. PubMed ID: 16684357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Semiparametric empirical likelihood confidence intervals for the difference of areas under two correlated ROC curves under density ratio model.
Zhang D; Zhang B
Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):678-96. PubMed ID: 24648388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets.
Zhai X; Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 28382718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. On the use of partial area under the ROC curve for comparison of two diagnostic tests.
Ma H; Bandos AI; Gur D
Biom J; 2015 Mar; 57(2):304-20. PubMed ID: 25537143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of Paired ROC Curves through a Two-Stage Test.
Yu W; Park E; Chang YC
J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):881-902. PubMed ID: 24905904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The Youden Index in the Generalized Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Context.
Martínez-Camblor P; Pardo-Fernández JC
Int J Biostat; 2019 Apr; 15(1):. PubMed ID: 30943172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Using Dual Beta Distributions to Create "Proper" ROC Curves Based on Rating Category Data.
Mossman D; Peng H
Med Decis Making; 2016 Apr; 36(3):349-65. PubMed ID: 25911601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Power calculation for comparing diagnostic accuracies in a multi-reader, multi-test design.
Kim E; Zhang Z; Wang Y; Zeng D
Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):1033-41. PubMed ID: 25355470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Semiparametric estimation of the relationship between ROC operating points and the test-result scale: application to the proper binormal model.
Pesce LL; Horsch K; Drukker K; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 2011 Dec; 18(12):1537-48. PubMed ID: 22055797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of adjustment methods for stratified two-sample tests in the context of ROC analysis.
Zou KH; Carlsson MO; Yu CR
Biom J; 2012 Mar; 54(2):249-63. PubMed ID: 22378312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
