BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19894395)

  • 1. Profound mixed hearing loss: bone-anchored hearing aid system or cochlear implant?
    Verhaegen VJ; Mulder JJ; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW; Snik AF
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2009 Oct; 118(10):693-7. PubMed ID: 19894395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fitting range of the BAHA Cordelle.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Aug; 45(8):429-37. PubMed ID: 17005485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: Six-month results from a multicentre study.
    den Besten CA; Monksfield P; Bosman A; Skarzynski PH; Green K; Runge C; Wigren S; Blechert JI; Flynn MC; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 44(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 30358920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new more powerful bone-anchored hearing aid: first results.
    van der Pouw CT; Carlsson P; Cremers CW; Snik AF
    Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 9728779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Bonebridge: preclinical evaluation of a new transcutaneously-activated bone anchored hearing device.
    Huber AM; Sim JH; Xie YZ; Chatzimichalis M; Ullrich O; Röösli C
    Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():93-9. PubMed ID: 23467173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing gain with a BAHA test-band in patients with single-sided deafness.
    Kim DY; Kim TS; Shim BS; Jin IS; Ahn JH; Chung JW; Yoon TH; Park HJ
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2014; 35(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 24035184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the evaluation of a superpower sound processor for bone-anchored hearing.
    Bosman AJ; Kruyt IJ; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS; Snik AFM
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 43(2):450-455. PubMed ID: 28950053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Treatment of severe to profound mixed hearing loss with the BAHA Cordelle II].
    Orús Dotú C; Santa Cruz Ruíz S; De Juan Beltrán J; Batuecas Caletrio A; Venegas Pizarro Mdel P; Muñoz Herrera A
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2011; 62(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 21300323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrospective audiological analysis of bone conduction versus round window vibratory stimulation in patients with mixed hearing loss.
    Mojallal H; Schwab B; Hinze AL; Giere T; Lenarz T
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 25735204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The bone conduction implant--first implantation, surgical and audiologic aspects.
    Eeg-Olofsson M; Håkansson B; Reinfeldt S; Taghavi H; Lund H; Jansson KJ; Håkansson E; Stalfors J
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Apr; 35(4):679-85. PubMed ID: 24317216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid: patient satisfaction with the Cordelle device.
    Ho EC; Monksfield P; Egan E; Reid A; Proops D
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):793-9. PubMed ID: 19623095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An overview of different systems: the bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Dun CAJ; Faber HT; de Wolf MJF; Cremers CWRJ; Hol MKS
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 71():22-31. PubMed ID: 21389701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audiological results with Baha in conductive and mixed hearing loss.
    Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 71():73-83. PubMed ID: 21389707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preliminary functional results and quality of life after implantation of a new bone conduction hearing device in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss.
    Ihler F; Volbers L; Blum J; Matthias C; Canis M
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 24448279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups.
    Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Stieger C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fitting range of the BAHA Intenso.
    Bosman AJ; Snik FM; Mylanus EA; Cremers WR
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(6):346-52. PubMed ID: 19925342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Better performance with bone-anchored hearing aid than acoustic devices in patients with severe air-bone gap.
    de Wolf MJ; Hendrix S; Cremers CW; Snik AF
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Mar; 121(3):613-6. PubMed ID: 21344443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study on speech in noise understanding with a direct acoustic cochlear implant in subjects with severe to profound mixed hearing loss.
    Lenarz T; Verhaert N; Desloovere C; Desmet J; D'hondt C; González JC; Kludt E; Macías AR; Skarżyński H; Van de Heyning P; Vyncke C; Wasowski A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(3):164-74. PubMed ID: 24556905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-related use and benefit of the bone-anchored hearing aid compact.
    de Wolf MJ; Leijendeckers JM; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF; Cremers CW
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 19638942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.