These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19894786)

  • 1. Attention modulates auditory adaptation produced by amplitude modulation.
    Kawashima T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):EL123-7. PubMed ID: 19894786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners.
    Saoji AA; Litvak L; Spahr AJ; Eddins DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):955-8. PubMed ID: 19739707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The pulse-train auditory aftereffect and the perception of rapid amplitude modulations.
    Gutschalk A; Micheyl C; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):935-45. PubMed ID: 18247896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between inexperienced listeners' perceptions and acoustic correlates of children's /r/ productions.
    Klein HB; Grigos MI; McAllister Byun T; Davidson L
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2012 Jul; 26(7):628-45. PubMed ID: 22690718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sound location can influence audiovisual speech perception when spatial attention is manipulated.
    Tiippana K; Puharinen H; Möttönen R; Sams M
    Seeing Perceiving; 2011; 24(1):67-90. PubMed ID: 21406157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breaking the wave: effects of attention and learning on concurrent sound perception.
    Alain C
    Hear Res; 2007 Jul; 229(1-2):225-36. PubMed ID: 17303355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptation of neuromagnetic N1 responses to phonetic stimuli by visual speech in humans.
    Jääskeläinen IP; Ojanen V; Ahveninen J; Auranen T; Levänen S; Möttönen R; Tarnanen I; Sams M
    Neuroreport; 2004 Dec; 15(18):2741-4. PubMed ID: 15597045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of amplitude modulation of background noise on auditory-evoked magnetic fields.
    Hiraumi H; Nagamine T; Morita T; Naito Y; Fukuyama H; Ito J
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1239():191-7. PubMed ID: 18778694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hearing two things at once: neurophysiological indices of speech segregation and identification.
    Alain C; Reinke K; He Y; Wang C; Lobaugh N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):811-8. PubMed ID: 15904547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech and non-speech processing in people with specific language impairment: a behavioural and electrophysiological study.
    McArthur GM; Bishop DV
    Brain Lang; 2005 Sep; 94(3):260-73. PubMed ID: 16098376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Natural boundaries in gap detection are related to categorical perception of stop consonants.
    Elangovan S; Stuart A
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):761-74. PubMed ID: 18769272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is discrimination training necessary to cause changes in the P2 auditory event-related brain potential to speech sounds?
    Sheehan KA; McArthur GM; Bishop DV
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 25(2):547-53. PubMed ID: 16198089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Top-down task effects overrule automatic multisensory responses to letter-sound pairs in auditory association cortex.
    van Atteveldt NM; Formisano E; Goebel R; Blomert L
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1345-60. PubMed ID: 17513133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discrimination of speech and of complex nonspeech sounds of different temporal structure in the left and right cerebral hemispheres.
    Shtyrov Y; Kujala T; Palva S; Ilmoniemi RJ; Näätänen R
    Neuroimage; 2000 Dec; 12(6):657-63. PubMed ID: 11112397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory N1 component to gaps in continuous narrowband noises.
    Atcherson SR; Gould HJ; Mendel MI; Ethington CA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):687-95. PubMed ID: 19675460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tone decay at threshold with auditory electrical stimulation in digisonic cochlear implantees.
    Wable J; Frachet B; Gallégo S
    Audiology; 2001; 40(5):265-71. PubMed ID: 11688545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The auditory aftereffects of radial sound source motion with different velocities].
    Andreeva IG; Malinina ES
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2011; 37(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 21469357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.