These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19894786)

  • 21. Recognition thresholds for a speech continuum following selective adaptation.
    Harris LB; Pastore RE
    Percept Psychophys; 1983 Sep; 34(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 6646969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Frequency-change aftereffect produced by adaptation to real and illusory unidirectional frequency sweeps.
    Masutomi K; Kashino M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL14-8. PubMed ID: 23862900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spatial inattention abolishes voice adaptation.
    Zäske R; Fritz C; Schweinberger SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Apr; 75(3):603-13. PubMed ID: 23315486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The auditory perception of frequency-localized acoustic on-events].
    Liublinskaia VV; Stoliarova EI; Malinnikova TG
    Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 1995 Jul; 81(7):120-30. PubMed ID: 8714387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Recognition of amplitude-modulation patterns in the presence of a distractor. I. Effects of correlation and frequency relation.
    Takeuchi AH; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jul; 98(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 7608392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Suprathreshold effects of adaptation produced by amplitude modulation.
    Wojtczak M; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Aug; 114(2):991-7. PubMed ID: 12942978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Time course of adaptation and recovery of channels selectively sensitive to frequency and amplitude modulation.
    Tansley BW; Suffield JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Sep; 74(3):765-75. PubMed ID: 6630734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Detection of appearing and disappearing objects in complex acoustic scenes.
    Cervantes Constantino F; Pinggera L; Paranamana S; Kashino M; Chait M
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e46167. PubMed ID: 23029426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Selective adaptation to linear frequency-modulated sweeps: evidence for direction-specific FM channels?
    Wakefield GH; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 May; 75(5):1588-92. PubMed ID: 6736421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Asymmetry and spatial specificity of auditory aftereffects following adaptation to signals simulating approach and withdrawal of sound sources].
    Malinina ES
    Zh Evol Biokhim Fiziol; 2014; 50(5):369-80. PubMed ID: 25786320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of acute anxiety induction on speech perception: are anxious listeners distracted listeners?
    Mattys SL; Seymour F; Attwood AS; Munafò MR
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Aug; 24(8):1606-8. PubMed ID: 23761927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Motor-motor adaptation: preliminary findings.
    Shuster LI; Fox RA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Oct; 69(2):435-41. PubMed ID: 2812986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. No adaptation in the amplitude modulation domain in trained listeners.
    Bruckert L; Herrmann M; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):3542-5. PubMed ID: 16838495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evidence for a reappraisal of the psychophysical selective adaptation paradigm.
    Moody DB; Cole D; Davidson LM; Stebbins WC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Oct; 76(4):1076-9. PubMed ID: 6501703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An evaluation of psychophysical models of auditory change perception.
    Micheyl C; Kaernbach C; Demany L
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Oct; 115(4):1069-83. PubMed ID: 18954215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relationship between adaptation and the percept and transformations of stop consonant voicing: effects of the number of repetitions and intensity of adaptors.
    Ohde RN; Sharf DJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Jul; 66(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 489830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Delayed auditory feedback with delayed sounds varying in duration.
    Howell P; Powell DJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Aug; 42(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 3627937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speech-Sounds Perception Test: analysis of a randomized answer form.
    Charter RA; Dutra RL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Aug; 87(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 9760627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The role of speech sound expectation in categorical perception (author's transl)].
    Kohn K
    Phonetica; 1981; 38(5-6):309-19. PubMed ID: 7330095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The selective adaptation effects of burst-cued stops.
    Ganong WF
    Percept Psychophys; 1978 Jul; 24(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 693243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.