These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19894827)

  • 1. Effects of masker envelope coherence on intensity discrimination.
    Buss E; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2467-78. PubMed ID: 19894827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Features of across-frequency envelope coherence critical for comodulation masking release.
    Buss E; Grose JH; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2455-66. PubMed ID: 19894826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of masker envelope irregularities on tone detection in narrowband and broadband noise maskers.
    Buss E; Hall JW; Grose JH
    Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 294(1-2):73-81. PubMed ID: 23117057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combination of masking releases for different center frequencies and masker amplitude statistics.
    Epp B; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2479-89. PubMed ID: 19894828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Across-channel masking and comodulation masking release.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Schooneveldt GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1683-94. PubMed ID: 2341672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of narrow-band noise maskers on increment detection.
    Messersmith JJ; Patra H; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):2973-87. PubMed ID: 21110593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Across-frequency envelope correlation discrimination and masked signal detection.
    Grose JH; Buss E; Porter HL; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1205-14. PubMed ID: 23927119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. External and internal limitations in amplitude-modulation processing.
    Ewert SD; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jul; 116(1):478-90. PubMed ID: 15296007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cortical representation of the combination of monaural and binaural unmasking.
    Uppenkamp S; Uhlig CH; Verhey JL
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():435-42. PubMed ID: 23716250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binaural detection of 500-Hz tones in broadband and in narrowband masking noise: effects of signal/masker duration and forward masking fringes.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):2981-93. PubMed ID: 16708954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency discrimination under conditions of comodulation masking release (L).
    Buss E; Grose JH; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2557-60. PubMed ID: 22501035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in the masking level difference with a narrowband masker at 500 or 2000 Hz.
    Buss E; Hall JW; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):411-9. PubMed ID: 17297796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of non-simultaneous masking on the binaural masking level difference.
    Buss E; Hall Iii JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):907-19. PubMed ID: 21361448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensorineural Hearing Loss Diminishes Use of Temporal Envelope Cues: Evidence From Roving-Level Tone-in-Noise Detection.
    Leong UC; Schwarz DM; Henry KS; Carney LH
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):1009-1019. PubMed ID: 31985535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence that comodulation detection differences depend on within-channel mechanisms.
    Borrill SJ; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):309-19. PubMed ID: 11833537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of level discrimination, increment detection, and comodulation masking release in the audio- and envelope-frequency domains.
    Nelson PC; Ewert SD; Carney LH; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2168-81. PubMed ID: 17471731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binaural modulation masking.
    Grantham DW; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1340-9. PubMed ID: 2030221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The intensitive DL of tones: dependence of signal/masker ratio on tone level and on spectrum of added noise.
    Greenwood DD
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):1-39. PubMed ID: 8458743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.