BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19894835)

  • 1. Effects of source-to-listener distance and masking on perception of cochlear implant processed speech in reverberant rooms.
    Whitmal NA; Poissant SF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2556-69. PubMed ID: 19894835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of reverberation and masking on speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations.
    Poissant SF; Whitmal NA; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1606-15. PubMed ID: 16583905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
    Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reverberation suppression in cochlear implants using a blind channel-selection strategy.
    Hazrati O; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4188-96. PubMed ID: 23742370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of reverberation on speech recognition in stationary and modulated noise by school-aged children and young adults.
    Wróblewski M; Lewis DE; Valente DL; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):731-44. PubMed ID: 22732772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prior exposure to a reverberant listening environment improves speech intelligibility in adult cochlear implant listeners.
    Srinivasan NK; Tobey EA; Loizou PC
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016; 17(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 26843090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parameter tuning of time-frequency masking algorithms for reverberant artifact removal within the cochlear implant stimulus.
    Shahidi LK; Collins LM; Mainsah BO
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Nov; 23(6):309-316. PubMed ID: 35875863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a spectral subtraction strategy to suppress reverberant energy in cochlear implant devices.
    Kokkinakis K; Runge C; Tahmina Q; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):115-24. PubMed ID: 26233012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing the effects of reverberation and of noise on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic listening.
    Helms Tillery K; Brown CA; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):416-23. PubMed ID: 22280603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Listener Factors Associated with Individual Susceptibility to Reverberation.
    Reinhart PN; Souza PE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 29309025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [On the effect of reverberation on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners].
    Mühler R; Ziese M; Rostalski D; Verhey JL
    HNO; 2014 Jan; 62(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 24270967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of noise and reverberation on speech intelligibility for cochlear implant recipients in realistic sound environments.
    Badajoz-Davila J; Buchholz JM; Van-Hoesel R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3538. PubMed ID: 32486825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit.
    Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):472-84. PubMed ID: 14663347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A channel-selection criterion for suppressing reverberation in cochlear implants.
    Kokkinakis K; Hazrati O; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3221-32. PubMed ID: 21568424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of overlap-masking on binaural reverberant word intelligibility.
    Libbey B; Rogers PH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3141-51. PubMed ID: 15603159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Payton KL; Uchanski RM; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1581-92. PubMed ID: 8176061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prior listening in rooms improves speech intelligibility.
    Brandewie E; Zahorik P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):291-9. PubMed ID: 20649224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recovering speech intelligibility with deep learning and multiple microphones in noisy-reverberant situations for people using cochlear implants.
    Gaultier C; Goehring T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Jun; 155(6):3833-3847. PubMed ID: 38884525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Xia J; Xu B; Pentony S; Xu J; Swaminathan J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Mar; 143(3):1523. PubMed ID: 29604671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.