These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19894843)

  • 1. Perceptual adaptation and intelligibility of multiple talkers for two types of degraded speech.
    Bent T; Buchwald A; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2660-9. PubMed ID: 19894843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Energetic and Informational Maskers for Native and Nonnative Listeners.
    Meemann K; Smiljanić R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Apr; 65(4):1263-1281. PubMed ID: 35235410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.
    Ji C; Galvin JJ; Chang YP; Xu A; Fu QJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 57(2):532-54. PubMed ID: 24686901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between talker acoustics, intelligibility, and effort in degraded listening conditions.
    Paulus M; Hazan V; Adank P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3348. PubMed ID: 32486777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.
    Loebach JL; Pisoni DB; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 19773659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-native talkers and listeners and the perceptual benefits of clear speech.
    Jung YJ; Dmitrieva O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jan; 153(1):137. PubMed ID: 36732255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does Time Compression Decrease Intelligibility for Female Talkers More Than for Male Talkers?
    Johnson EM; Morgan SD; Ferguson SH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Apr; 63(4):1083-1092. PubMed ID: 32259460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech.
    Bradlow AR; Bent T
    Cognition; 2008 Feb; 106(2):707-29. PubMed ID: 17532315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regularity Matters: Unpredictable Speech Degradation Inhibits Adaptation to Dysarthric Speech.
    Lansford KL; Borrie SA; Barrett TS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Dec; 62(12):4282-4290. PubMed ID: 31747531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of noise and talker intelligibility on judgments of accentedness.
    Gittleman S; Van Engen KJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):3138. PubMed ID: 29857746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors that can affect divided speech intelligibility.
    Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Hear Res; 2024 Jan; 441():108917. PubMed ID: 38061268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of talker- and listener-related factors on intelligibility for a real-word, open-set perception test.
    Markham D; Hazan V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 47(4):725-37. PubMed ID: 15324282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners.
    Ferguson SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2365-73. PubMed ID: 15532667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual learning of time-compressed and natural fast speech.
    Adank P; Janse E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2649-59. PubMed ID: 19894842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Generalized Learning of Dysarthric Speech Between Male and Female Talkers.
    Hirsch ME; Lansford KL; Barrett TS; Borrie SA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Feb; 64(2):444-451. PubMed ID: 33508210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Talker-specific learning in speech perception.
    Nygaard LC; Pisoni DB
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Apr; 60(3):355-76. PubMed ID: 9599989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhancing speech intelligibility: interactions among context, modality, speech style, and masker.
    Van Engen KJ; Phelps JE; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1908-18. PubMed ID: 24687206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.