308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19894843)
1. Perceptual adaptation and intelligibility of multiple talkers for two types of degraded speech.
Bent T; Buchwald A; Pisoni DB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2660-9. PubMed ID: 19894843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Energetic and Informational Maskers for Native and Nonnative Listeners.
Meemann K; Smiljanić R
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Apr; 65(4):1263-1281. PubMed ID: 35235410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.
Ji C; Galvin JJ; Chang YP; Xu A; Fu QJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 57(2):532-54. PubMed ID: 24686901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The relationship between talker acoustics, intelligibility, and effort in degraded listening conditions.
Paulus M; Hazan V; Adank P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3348. PubMed ID: 32486777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.
Loebach JL; Pisoni DB; Svirsky MA
Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 19773659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-native talkers and listeners and the perceptual benefits of clear speech.
Jung YJ; Dmitrieva O
J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jan; 153(1):137. PubMed ID: 36732255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
Peng ZE; Wang LM
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does Time Compression Decrease Intelligibility for Female Talkers More Than for Male Talkers?
Johnson EM; Morgan SD; Ferguson SH
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Apr; 63(4):1083-1092. PubMed ID: 32259460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech.
Bradlow AR; Bent T
Cognition; 2008 Feb; 106(2):707-29. PubMed ID: 17532315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors that can affect divided speech intelligibility.
Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
Hear Res; 2024 Jan; 441():108917. PubMed ID: 38061268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regularity Matters: Unpredictable Speech Degradation Inhibits Adaptation to Dysarthric Speech.
Lansford KL; Borrie SA; Barrett TS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Dec; 62(12):4282-4290. PubMed ID: 31747531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of noise and talker intelligibility on judgments of accentedness.
Gittleman S; Van Engen KJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):3138. PubMed ID: 29857746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of talker- and listener-related factors on intelligibility for a real-word, open-set perception test.
Markham D; Hazan V
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 47(4):725-37. PubMed ID: 15324282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners.
Ferguson SH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2365-73. PubMed ID: 15532667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceptual learning of time-compressed and natural fast speech.
Adank P; Janse E
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2649-59. PubMed ID: 19894842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Generalized Learning of Dysarthric Speech Between Male and Female Talkers.
Hirsch ME; Lansford KL; Barrett TS; Borrie SA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Feb; 64(2):444-451. PubMed ID: 33508210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Talker-specific learning in speech perception.
Nygaard LC; Pisoni DB
Percept Psychophys; 1998 Apr; 60(3):355-76. PubMed ID: 9599989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhancing speech intelligibility: interactions among context, modality, speech style, and masker.
Van Engen KJ; Phelps JE; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1908-18. PubMed ID: 24687206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]