These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19894843)
21. The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. Bent T; Bradlow AR J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1600-10. PubMed ID: 14514213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Visual Speech Benefit in Clear and Degraded Speech Depends on the Auditory Intelligibility of the Talker and the Number of Background Talkers. Blackburn CL; Kitterick PT; Jones G; Sumner CJ; Stacey PC Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519837866. PubMed ID: 30909814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Talker intelligibility differences in cochlear implant listeners. Green T; Katiri S; Faulkner A; Rosen S J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):EL223-9. PubMed ID: 17552573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The influence of voice quality and multi-talker babble noise on sentence processing and recall performance in school children using cochlear implant and/or hearing aids. Jonas Brännström K; von Lochow H; Lyberg-Åhlander V; Sahlén B Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2019 Jul; 44(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 30204510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Child, Young Adult, and Older Adult Talkers. Smiljanic R; Gilbert RC J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 60(11):3069-3080. PubMed ID: 29075748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners. Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Passage comprehension performance in children with cochlear implants and/or hearing aids: the effects of voice quality and multi-talker babble noise in relation to executive function. Brännström KJ; von Lochow H; Lyberg Åhlander V; Sahlén B Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2020 Apr; 45(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 30879365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The Effect of Talker and Listener Depressive Symptoms on Speech Intelligibility. Yi H; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Dec; 62(12):4269-4281. PubMed ID: 31738862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. English sentence recognition in speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native listeners. Jin SH; Liu C J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23145700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Spoken word recognition in adolescent cochlear implant users during quiet and multispeaker babble conditions. Tobey EA; Shin S; Sundarrajan M; Geers AE Otol Neurotol; 2011 Apr; 32(3):413-8. PubMed ID: 21307815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for older adults with hearing loss. Ferguson SH J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):779-90. PubMed ID: 22223894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Vibro-Tactile Enhancement of Speech Intelligibility in Multi-talker Noise for Simulated Cochlear Implant Listening. Fletcher MD; Mills SR; Goehring T Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518797838. PubMed ID: 30222089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible? Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Speech Understanding With Various Maskers in Cochlear-Implant and Simulated Cochlear-Implant Hearing: Effects of Spectral Resolution and Implications for Masking Release. Croghan NBH; Smith ZM Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518787276. PubMed ID: 30022730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners. Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker. Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Divided listening in the free field becomes asymmetric when acoustic cues are limited. Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108444. PubMed ID: 35078133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Perceptual Discrimination of Speaking Style Under Cochlear Implant Simulation. Tamati TN; Janse E; Başkent D Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 29742545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]