These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Perceptual normalization for speaking rate: effects of temporal distance. Newman RS; Sawusch JR Percept Psychophys; 1996 May; 58(4):540-60. PubMed ID: 8934686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Species differences in the identification of acoustic stimuli by birds. Dent ML; Welch TE; McClaine EM; Shinn-Cunningham BG Behav Processes; 2008 Feb; 77(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 18164143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phonological perception by birds: budgerigars can perceive lexical stress. Hoeschele M; Fitch WT Anim Cogn; 2016 May; 19(3):643-54. PubMed ID: 26914456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An investigation of speech perception in children with specific language impairment on a continuum of formant transition duration. Burlingame E; Sussman HM; Gillam RB; Hay JF J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Aug; 48(4):805-16. PubMed ID: 16378475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discrimination of synthetic full-formant and sinewave/ra-la/continua by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Dooling RJ; Best CT; Brown SD J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Mar; 97(3):1839-46. PubMed ID: 7699165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Naming pseudowords in Spanish: effects of syllable frequency. Carreiras M; Perea M Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):393-400. PubMed ID: 15172555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Talker continuity and the use of rate information during phonetic perception. Green KP; Stevens EB; Kuhl PK Percept Psychophys; 1994 Mar; 55(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 8036106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experience with speech sounds is not necessary for cue trading by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). Flaherty M; Dent ML; Sawusch JR PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177676. PubMed ID: 28562597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech perception by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): the voiced-voiceless distinction. Dooling RJ; Okanoya K; Brown SD Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jul; 46(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 2755763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MMN to natural Arabic CV syllables: 2 - cross language study. Zeftawi MS Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 210(1-2):24-9. PubMed ID: 16055287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perception of synthetic speech sounds by hearing-impaired listeners. Godfrey JJ; Millay KK J Aud Res; 1980 Jul; 20(3):187-203. PubMed ID: 7347740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables. Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptual assimilation and L2 learning: evidence from the perception of Southern British English vowels by native speakers of Greek and Japanese. Lengeris A Phonetica; 2009; 66(3):169-87. PubMed ID: 19776666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]