These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19895357)

  • 1. Membrane sweeping to induce labor in low-risk patients at term pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial.
    Yildirim G; Güngördük K; Karadağ OI; Aslan H; Turhan E; Ceylan Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jul; 23(7):681-7. PubMed ID: 19895357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of membrane sweeping at term pregnancy on duration of pregnancy and labor induction: a randomized trial.
    Kashanian M; Akbarian A; Baradaran H; Samiee MM
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2006; 62(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 16534210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effectiveness of sweeping membranes at term: a randomized trial.
    Crane J; Bennett K; Young D; Windrim R; Kravitz H
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):586-90. PubMed ID: 9083317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Membrane sweeping and prevention of post-term pregnancy in low-risk pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial.
    de Miranda E; van der Bom JG; Bonsel GJ; Bleker OP; Rosendaal FR
    BJOG; 2006 Apr; 113(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 16489935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does sweeping of membranes beyond 40 weeks reduce the need for formal induction of labour?
    Wong SF; Hui SK; Choi H; Ho LC
    BJOG; 2002 Jun; 109(6):632-6. PubMed ID: 12118640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Serial membrane sweeping at term in planned vaginal birth after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
    Hamdan M; Sidhu K; Sabir N; Omar SZ; Tan PC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 114(4):745-751. PubMed ID: 19888030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acupuncture and/or sweeping of the fetal membranes before induction of labor: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
    Andersen BB; Knudsen B; Lyndrup J; Fælling AE; Illum D; Johansen M; Borgen A; Jager H; Bjerre C; Secher NJ
    J Perinat Med; 2013 Sep; 41(5):555-60. PubMed ID: 23612695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Membrane sweeping at initiation of formal labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Tan PC; Jacob R; Omar SZ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 107(3):569-77. PubMed ID: 16507926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sweeping of the membranes versus uterine stimulation by oxytocin in nulliparous women. A randomized controlled trial.
    Salamalekis E; Vitoratos N; Kassanos D; Loghis C; Batalias L; Panayotopoulos N; Creatsas G
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2000; 49(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 10828706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of Single Fetal Membrane Sweeping in Reducing Elective Labor Induction for Postdate Pregnancies (38+0 to 40+6 Weeks): A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Ehikioya E; Nwachukwu OB; Okobi OE
    Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e58030. PubMed ID: 38738107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Membrane sweeping at term to promote spontaneous labour and reduce the likelihood of a formal induction of labour for postmaturity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Avdiyovski H; Haith-Cooper M; Scally A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Jan; 39(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 30284490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a bespoke training to increase uptake by midwifery teams of NICE Guidance for membrane sweeping to reduce induction of labour: a stepped wedge cluster randomised design.
    Kenyon S; Dann S; Hope L; Clarke P; Hogan A; Jenkinson D; Hemming K
    Trials; 2017 Jul; 18(1):357. PubMed ID: 28750676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of membrane sweeping on prelabor rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial.
    Hill MJ; McWilliams GD; Garcia-Sur D; Chen B; Munroe M; Hoeldtke NJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1313-9. PubMed ID: 18515514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of obstetrical outcomes with labor induction agents used at term.
    Aghideh FK; Mullin PM; Ingles S; Ouzounian JG; Opper N; Wilson ML; Miller DA; Lee RH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Apr; 27(6):592-6. PubMed ID: 23919802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of Term Induction in Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Analysis of a Modern Obstetric Cohort.
    Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 126(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 26241264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Induction of labor or serial antenatal fetal monitoring in postterm pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Heimstad R; Skogvoll E; Mattsson LA; Johansen OJ; Eik-Nes SH; Salvesen KA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 109(3):609-17. PubMed ID: 17329511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Twice-Weekly Versus Once-Weekly Membrane Sweeping in the Prevention of Post-Term Pregnancy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Baradwan S; Alshahrani MS; Khadawardi K; Ghazi A; Badghish E; Alsawy IR; Hegazy MA; Marai AA; Rashed AR; Elsayed TS; Ibrahim EM; Abdelhakim AM; Elsharkawy S
    Reprod Sci; 2024 Jan; 31(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 37500977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of membrane stripping and nonstripping for induction of labor in uncomplicated term pregnancy.
    Tannirandorn Y; Jumrustanasan T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Mar; 82(3):229-33. PubMed ID: 10410476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of sweeping the membranes on cervical length and labor: a randomized clinical trial.
    Parlakgumus HA; Yalcinkaya C; Haydardedeoglu B; Tarim E
    Ginekol Pol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):682-7. PubMed ID: 25322540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized controlled trial on early induction compared to expectant management of nulliparous women with prolonged latent phases.
    Bräne E; Olsson A; Andolf E
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Oct; 93(10):1042-9. PubMed ID: 24974855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.