BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19896047)

  • 1. Strength of single- versus double-anchor repair of type II SLAP lesions: a cadaveric study.
    Baldini T; Snyder RL; Peacher G; Bach J; McCarty E
    Arthroscopy; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1257-60. PubMed ID: 19896047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A biomechanical comparison of two suture anchor configurations for the repair of type II SLAP lesions subjected to a peel-back mechanism of failure.
    Morgan RJ; Kuremsky MA; Peindl RD; Fleischli JE
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Apr; 24(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 18375268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical comparison of 3 suture anchor configurations for repair of type II SLAP lesions.
    Domb BG; Ehteshami JR; Shindle MK; Gulotta L; Zoghi-Moghadam M; MacGillivray JD; Altchek DW
    Arthroscopy; 2007 Feb; 23(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 17276220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical comparison of knotless anchor repair versus simple suture repair for type II SLAP lesions.
    Uggen C; Wei A; Glousman RE; ElAttrache N; Tibone JE; McGarry MH; Lee TQ
    Arthroscopy; 2009 Oct; 25(10):1085-92. PubMed ID: 19801286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pullout strength of knotless suture anchors.
    Leedle BP; Miller MD
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Jan; 21(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 15650671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cyclic load testing of biodegradable suture anchors containing 2 high-strength sutures.
    Barber FA; Coons DA; Ruiz-Suarez M
    Arthroscopy; 2007 Apr; 23(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 17418326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What do you do when you have a loose screw?
    Brady PC; Arrigoni P; Burkhart SS
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Sep; 22(9):925-30. PubMed ID: 16952719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A biomechanical analysis of two biceps tenodesis fixation techniques.
    Richards DP; Burkhart SS
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Jul; 21(7):861-6. PubMed ID: 16012500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical comparison of a knotless suture anchor with standard suture anchor in the repair of type II SLAP tears.
    Sileo MJ; Lee SJ; Kremenic IJ; Orishimo K; Ben-Avi S; McHugh M; Nicholas SJ
    Arthroscopy; 2009 Apr; 25(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 19341920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cyclic load testing and ultimate failure strength of biodegradable glenoid anchors.
    Barber FA; Coons DA; Ruiz-Suarez M
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Feb; 24(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 18237708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Arthroscopic suture anchor capsulorrhaphy versus labral-based suture capsulorrhaphy in a cadaveric model.
    Gillis RC; Donaldson CT; Kim H; Love JM; Dreese JC
    Arthroscopy; 2012 Nov; 28(11):1615-21. PubMed ID: 22943847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modes of failure of knotted and knotless suture anchors in an arthroscopic bankart repair model with the capsulolabral tissues intact.
    Ranawat AS; Golish SR; Miller MD; Caldwell PE; Singanamala N; Treme G; Costic R; Hart JM; Sekiya JK
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2011 Mar; 40(3):134-8. PubMed ID: 21720601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison of transosseous versus suture anchor repair of the subscapularis tendon.
    Wheeler DJ; Garabekyan T; Lugo R; Buckley JM; Jones C; Lotz M; Lotz JC; Ma CB
    Arthroscopy; 2010 Apr; 26(4):444-50. PubMed ID: 20362822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical Comparison of Knotless All-Suture Anchors and Knotted All-Suture Anchors in Type II SLAP Lesions: A Cadaveric Study.
    Nolte PC; Midtgaard KS; Ciccotti M; Miles JW; Tanghe KK; Lacheta L; Millett PJ
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Aug; 36(8):2094-2102. PubMed ID: 32591261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect on external rotation of an anchor placed anterior to the biceps in type 2 SLAP repairs in a cadaveric throwing model.
    McCulloch PC; Andrews WJ; Alexander J; Brekke A; Duwani S; Noble P
    Arthroscopy; 2013 Jan; 29(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 23177591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Arthroscopic treatment of isolated type II SLAP lesions: biceps tenodesis as an alternative to reinsertion.
    Boileau P; Parratte S; Chuinard C; Roussanne Y; Shia D; Bicknell R
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 May; 37(5):929-36. PubMed ID: 19229046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Restoration of labral anatomy and biomechanics after superior labral anterior-posterior repair: comparison of mattress versus simple technique.
    Boddula MR; Adamson GJ; Gupta A; McGarry MH; Lee TQ
    Am J Sports Med; 2012 Apr; 40(4):875-81. PubMed ID: 22302203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical evaluation of open suture anchor fixation versus interference screw for biceps tenodesis.
    Papp DF; Skelley NW; Sutter EG; Ji JH; Wierks CH; Belkoff SM; McFarland EG
    Orthopedics; 2011 Jul; 34(7):e275-8. PubMed ID: 21717988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Footprint contact restoration between the biceps-labrum complex and the glenoid rim in SLAP repair: a comparative cadaveric study using pressure-sensitive film.
    Kim SJ; Kim SH; Lee SK; Lee JH; Chun YM
    Arthroscopy; 2013 Jun; 29(6):1005-11. PubMed ID: 23726107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rotator cuff repair: an ex vivo analysis of suture anchor repair techniques on initial load to failure.
    Cummins CA; Appleyard RC; Strickland S; Haen PS; Chen S; Murrell GA
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Oct; 21(10):1236-41. PubMed ID: 16226653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.