140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19896068)
1. Conspicuity of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming.
Haygood TM; Arribas E; Brennan PC; Atkinson EN; Herndon M; Dieber J; Geiser W; Santiago L; Mills CM; Davis P; Adrada B; Carkaci S; Stephens TW; Whitman GJ
Acad Radiol; 2009 Dec; 16(12):1509-17. PubMed ID: 19896068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming.
Haygood TM; Arribas E; Liu QM; Atkinson EN; Brennan PC; Santiago L; Carkaci S; Lane D; Stephens TW; LePetross H; Adrada B; Davis P; Whitman GJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Oct; 197(4):W761-8. PubMed ID: 21940549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparing the clinical value of spot view mammography with reduced pixel size to monitor zooming by reporting microcalcifications in digital mammography].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Adamietz B; Lell M; Böhner C; Uder M; Bautz WA
Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):492-6. PubMed ID: 17436183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital mammography: observer performance study of the effects of pixel size on the characterization of malignant and benign microcalcifications.
Chan HP; Helvie MA; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Adler DD; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Blane CE; Joynt LK; Wilson TE; Hadjiiski LM; Goodsitt MM
Acad Radiol; 2001 Jun; 8(6):454-66. PubMed ID: 11394537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparing the visualization of microcalcifications with direct magnification in digital full-field mammography vs. film-screen mammography].
Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Bick U; Rogalla P; Blohmer JU; Winzer KJ; Hamm B
Rofo; 2002 Mar; 174(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 11885006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Zooming method (x 2.0) of digital mammography vs digital magnification view (x 1.8) in full-field digital mammography for the diagnosis of microcalcifications.
Kim MJ; Youk JH; Kang DR; Choi SH; Kwak JY; Son EJ; Kim EK
Br J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 83(990):486-92. PubMed ID: 19752171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital mammography: effects of reduced radiation dose on diagnostic performance.
Samei E; Saunders RS; Baker JA; Delong DM
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):396-404. PubMed ID: 17356178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity of a direct computer-aided detection system in full-field digital mammography for detection of microcalcifications not associated with mass or architectural distortion.
Scaranelo AM; Crystal P; Bukhanov K; Helbich TH
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2010 Jun; 61(3):162-9. PubMed ID: 20137883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Digital full field mammography: comparison between radiographic direct magnification and digital monitor zooming].
Fischer U; Baum F; Obenauer S; Funke M; Hermann KP; Grabbe E
Radiologe; 2002 Apr; 42(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 12063732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for identifying histological classification of clustered microcalcifications by use of follow-up magnification mammograms.
Nakayama R; Watanabe R; Namba K; Takeda K; Yamamoto K; Katsuragawa S; Doi K
Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1219-28. PubMed ID: 16979071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigation of psychophysical similarity measures for selection of similar images in the diagnosis of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms.
Muramatsu C; Li Q; Schmidt R; Shiraishi J; Doi K
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5695-702. PubMed ID: 19175126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Visualization of microcalcifications on mammographies obtained by digital full-field mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography].
Diekmann S; Bick U; von Heyden H; Diekmann F
Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):775-9. PubMed ID: 12811689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].
Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P
Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of a priori information in the detection of mammographic microcalcifications to improve their classification.
Salfity MF; Nishikawa RM; Jiang Y; Papaioannou J
Med Phys; 2003 May; 30(5):823-31. PubMed ID: 12772990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of magnification views on the characterization of microcalcifications in digital mammography.
Fallenberg EM; Dimitrijevic L; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Kettritz U; Poellinger A; Bick U; Winzer KJ; Engelken F; Renz DM
Rofo; 2014 Mar; 186(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 23999780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose dependence of mass and microcalcification detection in digital mammography: free response human observer studies.
Ruschin M; Timberg P; Båth M; Hemdal B; Svahn T; Saunders RS; Samei E; Andersson I; Mattsson S; Chakrabort DP; Tingber A
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):400-7. PubMed ID: 17388156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer aided detection system for micro calcifications in digital mammograms.
Mohamed H; Mabrouk MS; Sharawy A
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Oct; 116(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 24909786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories.
Bent CK; Bassett LW; D'Orsi CJ; Sayre JW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):1378-83. PubMed ID: 20410428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automatic detection of microcalcifications with multi-fractal spectrum.
Ding Y; Dai H; Zhang H
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3049-54. PubMed ID: 25227013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analogic versus digital mammographic examination a radiological study of mammary microcalcifications on 52 surgical samples.
Di Nubila B; Cassano E; Origgi D; Treviganti R; Bozzini A; Cernigliaro F; Faissola B; Meneghetti L; Renne G; Balestreri N; Luini A; Bellomi M
Radiol Med; 2003 Oct; 106(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 14612821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
