These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19896129)
1. Probabilistic finite element analysis of the uncemented hip replacement--effect of femur characteristics and implant design geometry. Dopico-González C; New AM; Browne M J Biomech; 2010 Feb; 43(3):512-20. PubMed ID: 19896129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A computational tool for the probabilistic finite element analysis of an uncemented total hip replacement considering variability in bone-implant version angle. Dopico-González C; New AM; Browne M Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2010 Feb; 13(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19488912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses]. Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Probabilistic analysis of an uncemented total hip replacement. Dopico-González C; New AM; Browne M Med Eng Phys; 2009 May; 31(4):470-6. PubMed ID: 19217340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A finite element analysis of the vibrational behaviour of the intra-operatively manufactured prosthesis-femur system. Pastrav LC; Devos J; Van der Perre G; Jaecques SV Med Eng Phys; 2009 May; 31(4):489-94. PubMed ID: 19136292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of three-dimensional shape optimization on the probabilistic response of a cemented femoral hip prosthesis. Nicolella DP; Thacker BH; Katoozian H; Davy DT J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1265-78. PubMed ID: 15961093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mesh morphing for finite element analysis of implant positioning in cementless total hip replacements. Bah MT; Nair PB; Browne M Med Eng Phys; 2009 Dec; 31(10):1235-43. PubMed ID: 19744873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Primary stability of an anatomical cementless hip stem: a statistical analysis. Viceconti M; Brusi G; Pancanti A; Cristofolini L J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1169-79. PubMed ID: 15927191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Primary stability of uncemented femoral resurfacing implants for varying interface parameters and material formulations during walking and stair climbing. Rothstock S; Uhlenbrock A; Bishop N; Morlock M J Biomech; 2010 Feb; 43(3):521-6. PubMed ID: 19913227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficient computational method for assessing the effects of implant positioning in cementless total hip replacements. Bah MT; Nair PB; Taylor M; Browne M J Biomech; 2011 Apr; 44(7):1417-22. PubMed ID: 21295306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Geometric element analysis of fretting in a model of a modular femoral component of a hip implant. Lewis G Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 14757952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite element analysis of a three-dimensional model of a proximal femur-cemented femoral THJR component construct: influence of assigned interface conditions on strain energy density. Lewis G; Duggineni R Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(5):319-27. PubMed ID: 17075167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simulation of physiological loading in total hip replacements. Ramos A; Fonseca F; Simões JA J Biomech Eng; 2006 Aug; 128(4):579-87. PubMed ID: 16813449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis]. Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical evaluation of proximal tibia behaviour with the use of femoral stems in revision TKA: an in vitro and finite element analysis. Completo A; Rego A; Fonseca F; Ramos A; Relvas C; Simões JA Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2010 Feb; 25(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 19944503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Subject specific finite element analysis of implant stability for a cementless femoral stem. Pettersen SH; Wik TS; Skallerud B Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Jul; 24(6):480-7. PubMed ID: 19368993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Probabilistic analysis of the influence of the bonding degree of the stem-cement interface in the performance of cemented hip prostheses. Pérez MA; Grasa J; García-Aznar JM; Bea JA; Doblaré M J Biomech; 2006; 39(10):1859-72. PubMed ID: 16054633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of cement mantle thickness and stem geometry on fatigue damage in two different cemented hip femoral prostheses. Ramos A; Simões JA J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2602-10. PubMed ID: 19660758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cortical and interfacial bone changes around a non-cemented hip implant: simulations using a combined strain/damage remodelling algorithm. Scannell PT; Prendergast PJ Med Eng Phys; 2009 May; 31(4):477-88. PubMed ID: 19188086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A short plate compression screw with diagonal bolts--a biomechanical evaluation performed experimentally and by numerical computation. Peleg E; Mosheiff R; Liebergall M; Mattan Y Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Nov; 21(9):963-8. PubMed ID: 16893595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]