These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Flow cytometric determination of the sperm cell number in diluted bull semen samples by DNA staining method. Takács T; Szöllösi J; Balázs M; Gáspár R; Mátyus L; Szabó G; Trón L; Resli I; Damjanovich S Acta Biochim Biophys Hung; 1987; 22(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 2448980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality control in boar semen production by use of the FACSCount AF system. Christensen P; Knudsen DB; Wachmann H; Madsen MT Theriogenology; 2004 Oct; 62(7):1218-28. PubMed ID: 15325548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of FACSCount AF system, Improved Neubauer hemocytometer, Corning 254 photometer, SpermVision, UltiMate and NucleoCounter SP-100 for determination of sperm concentration of boar semen. Hansen C; Vermeiden T; Vermeiden JP; Simmet C; Day BC; Feitsma H Theriogenology; 2006 Dec; 66(9):2188-94. PubMed ID: 16920186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of flow cytometric methods to measure human sperm concentration. Eustache F; Jouannet P; Auger J J Androl; 2001; 22(4):558-67. PubMed ID: 11451352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of motility and flow cytometric assessments of seminal quality in fresh, 24-hour extended and cryopreserved human spermatozoa. Kramer RY; Garner DL; Bruns ES; Ericsson SA; Prins GS J Androl; 1993; 14(5):374-84. PubMed ID: 8288491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Controlled cooling during semen cryopreservation does not induce capacitation of spermatozoa from two portions of the boar ejaculate. Saravia F; Hernández M; Wallgren M; Johannisson A; Rodríguez-Martínez H Int J Androl; 2007 Dec; 30(6):485-99. PubMed ID: 17651408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual DNA staining assessment of bovine sperm viability using SYBR-14 and propidium iodide. Garner DL; Johnson LA; Yue ST; Roth BL; Haugland RP J Androl; 1994; 15(6):620-9. PubMed ID: 7721666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mathematical analysis of mis-estimation of cell subsets in flow cytometry: viability staining revisited. Petrunkina AM; Harrison RA J Immunol Methods; 2011 May; 368(1-2):71-9. PubMed ID: 21362427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of sperm samples from infertile men by flow cytometry]. Wald M; Lewin LM; Soffer Y; Oschri Y; Shochat L; Vigodner M; Golan R Harefuah; 2004 Jan; 143(1):22-5, 86. PubMed ID: 14748283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flow cytometric comparison between swim-up and Percoll gradient techniques for the separation of frozen-thawed human spermatozoa. Chen Y; Obhrai MS; Chapman J; Cuthbert JL; Williams A; Tang L Int J Fertil; 1992; 37(5):315-9. PubMed ID: 1358845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation and application of an assay for deoxyribonucleic acid to estimate concentrations of bull sperm. Fenton SE; Ax RL; Cowan CM; Coyle T; Gilbert GR; Lenz RW J Dairy Sci; 1990 Nov; 73(11):3118-25. PubMed ID: 2273141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A multicenter study evaluating the flowcytometric-based kit for semen analysis. Shai S; Roudebush W; Powers D; Dirnfeld M; Lamb DJ Fertil Steril; 2005 Apr; 83(4):1034-8. PubMed ID: 15820817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]