These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19896420)

  • 1. Stabilizing the baseline current of a microbial fuel cell-based biosensor through overpotential control under non-toxic conditions.
    Stein NE; Hamelers HV; Buisman CN
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2010 Apr; 78(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 19896420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Silicon-based microfabricated microbial fuel cell toxicity sensor.
    Dávila D; Esquivel JP; Sabaté N; Mas J
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2011 Jan; 26(5):2426-30. PubMed ID: 21074397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Kinetic models for detection of toxicity in a microbial fuel cell based biosensor.
    Stein NE; Keesman KJ; Hamelers HV; van Straten G
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2011 Mar; 26(7):3115-20. PubMed ID: 21216586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancing the response of microbial fuel cell based toxicity sensors to Cu(II) with the applying of flow-through electrodes and controlled anode potentials.
    Jiang Y; Liang P; Zhang C; Bian Y; Yang X; Huang X; Girguis PR
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Aug; 190():367-72. PubMed ID: 25965954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proton transport inside the biofilm limits electrical current generation by anode-respiring bacteria.
    Torres CI; Kato Marcus A; Rittmann BE
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Aug; 100(5):872-81. PubMed ID: 18551519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous organics removal and bio-electrochemical denitrification in microbial fuel cells.
    Jia YH; Tran HT; Kim DH; Oh SJ; Park DH; Zhang RH; Ahn DH
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2008 Jun; 31(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 17909860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Voltammetric determination of epinephrine by White rot fungi (Phanerochaete chrysosporium ME446) cells based microbial biosensor.
    Akyilmaz E; Turemis M; Yasa I
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2011 Jan; 26(5):2590-4. PubMed ID: 21115238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microbial fuel cell biosensor for in situ assessment of microbial activity.
    Tront JM; Fortner JD; Plötze M; Hughes JB; Puzrin AM
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2008 Dec; 24(4):586-90. PubMed ID: 18621521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrated function of microbial fuel cell (MFC) as bio-electrochemical treatment system associated with bioelectricity generation under higher substrate load.
    Mohan SV; Raghavulu SV; Peri D; Sarma PN
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2009 Mar; 24(7):2021-7. PubMed ID: 19058958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Model based evaluation of the effect of pH and electrode geometry on microbial fuel cell performance.
    Picioreanu C; van Loosdrecht MC; Curtis TP; Scott K
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2010 Apr; 78(1):8-24. PubMed ID: 19523880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is resistance futile? Changing external resistance does not improve microbial fuel cell performance.
    Lyon DY; Buret F; Vogel TM; Monier JM
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2010 Apr; 78(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 19783225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Responses from freshwater sediment during electricity generation using microbial fuel cells.
    Hong SW; Chang IS; Choi YS; Kim BH; Chung TH
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2009 Apr; 32(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 18751733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The anode potential regulates bacterial activity in microbial fuel cells.
    Aelterman P; Freguia S; Keller J; Verstraete W; Rabaey K
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 78(3):409-18. PubMed ID: 18193419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation of power generation at different buffer types and conductivities in single chamber microbial fuel cells.
    Nam JY; Kim HW; Lim KH; Shin HS; Logan BE
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2010 Jan; 25(5):1155-9. PubMed ID: 19896357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Positive anodic poised potential regulates microbial fuel cell performance with the function of open and closed circuitry.
    Srikanth S; Venkata Mohan S; Sarma PN
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jul; 101(14):5337-44. PubMed ID: 20223657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of electrolyte pH on the rate of the anodic and cathodic reactions in an air-cathode microbial fuel cell.
    He Z; Huang Y; Manohar AK; Mansfeld F
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2008 Nov; 74(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 18774345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving phosphate buffer-free cathode performance of microbial fuel cell based on biological nitrification.
    You SJ; Ren NQ; Zhao QL; Kiely PD; Wang JY; Yang FL; Fu L; Peng L
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2009 Aug; 24(12):3698-701. PubMed ID: 19502045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved energy output levels from small-scale Microbial Fuel Cells.
    Ieropoulos I; Greenman J; Melhuish C
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2010 Apr; 78(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 19540172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electricity generation from cellulose by rumen microorganisms in microbial fuel cells.
    Rismani-Yazdi H; Christy AD; Dehority BA; Morrison M; Yu Z; Tuovinen OH
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Aug; 97(6):1398-407. PubMed ID: 17274068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of initial biofilm growth on the anode impedance of microbial fuel cells.
    Ramasamy RP; Ren Z; Mench MM; Regan JM
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Sep; 101(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 18646217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.