These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19896625)

  • 21. Strength retention of chromic gut and monofilament synthetic absorbable suture materials in joint tissues.
    Walton M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 May; (242):303-10. PubMed ID: 2495876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quantitative evaluation of stiffness of commercial suture materials.
    Chu CC; Kizil Z
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Mar; 168(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 2919353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS.
    Bourne RB; Bitar H; Andreae PR; Martin LM; Finlay JB; Marquis F
    Can J Surg; 1988 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2827875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of re-sterilization of surgical sutures by ethylene oxide.
    Nagaraja PA; Shetty D
    ANZ J Surg; 2007; 77(1-2):80-3. PubMed ID: 17295827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro loss of tensile strength and elasticity of five absorbable suture materials in sterile and infected canine urine.
    Schiller TD; Stone EA; Gupta BS
    Vet Surg; 1993; 22(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 8362503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Suture strength and angle of load application in a suture anchor eyelet.
    Deakin M; Stubbs D; Bruce W; Goldberg J; Gillies RM; Walsh WR
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Dec; 21(12):1447-51. PubMed ID: 16376233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The properties of damaged and undamaged suture used in metal and bioabsorbable anchors: an in vitro study.
    Wright PB; Budoff JE; Yeh ML; Kelm ZS; Luo ZP
    Arthroscopy; 2007 Jun; 23(6):655-61. PubMed ID: 17560481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biodegradation of absorbable sutures in body fluids and pH buffers.
    Freudenberg S; Rewerk S; Kaess M; Weiss C; Dorn-Beinecke A; Post S
    Eur Surg Res; 2004; 36(6):376-85. PubMed ID: 15591748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Duration of wound healing and tissue resistance as important criteria for selecting suture materials in colon surgery].
    Lünstedt B; Debus S
    Chirurg; 1990 Oct; 61(10):717-9. PubMed ID: 2276302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mechanical and handling properties of braided polyblend polyethylene sutures in comparison to braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures.
    Wüst DM; Meyer DC; Favre P; Gerber C
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1146-53. PubMed ID: 17084288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Suture damage during robot-assisted vascular surgery: is it an issue?
    Diks J; Nio D; Linsen MA; Rauwerda JA; Wisselink W
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Dec; 17(6):524-7. PubMed ID: 18097315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of Fluoridated Mouthwashes on Strength and Durability of Three Different Synthetic Absorbable Suturing Materials: An
    Awasthi N; Ramanna PK; Lahiri B; Das A; Ravi RV; Mishra D
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Apr; 23(4):431-436. PubMed ID: 35945837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Lapra-Ty holding strength and slippage with various suture types and sizes.
    Weld KJ; Arzola J; Montiglio C; Bush AC; Cespedes RD
    Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 18242360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of bacteria on absorbable sutures.
    Williams DF
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 May; 14(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 6245093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Strength retention of chromic gut and synthetic absorbable sutures in a nonhealing synovial wound.
    Walton M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Jun; (267):294-8. PubMed ID: 1904335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An in vitro evaluation of the stability of mechanical properties of surgical suture materials in various pH conditions.
    Chu CC; Moncrief G
    Ann Surg; 1983 Aug; 198(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 6870380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dynamic loading of surgical knots.
    Brouwers JE; Oosting H; de Haas D; Klopper PJ
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Dec; 173(6):443-8. PubMed ID: 1948600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The relative importance of Vicryl and Prolene sutures to the strength of healing abdominal wounds.
    Nilsson T
    Acta Chir Scand; 1981; 147(7):503-7. PubMed ID: 6213133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of a new synthetic absorbable suture for ophthalmic surgery.
    Dunlap WA; Purnell WD; McPherson SD
    Adv Ophthalmol; 1976; 33():49-61. PubMed ID: 790910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mechanical behavior of chemically treated ostrich pericardium subjected to uniaxial tensile testing: influence of the suture.
    García Páez JM; Carrera A; Herrero EJ; Millán I; Rocha A; Cordón A; Téllez G; Maestro M; Calero P; Castillo-Olivares JL
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2002 Oct; 62(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 12124788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.