These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19896625)

  • 41. Breaking strength of barbed polypropylene sutures: rater-blinded, controlled comparison with nonbarbed sutures of various calibers.
    Rashid RM; Sartori M; White LE; Villa MT; Yoo SS; Alam M
    Arch Dermatol; 2007 Jul; 143(7):869-72. PubMed ID: 17638730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Laboratory analysis of the flax suture materials].
    Jarosz-Cichulska H
    Polim Med; 1982; 12(1-2):39-54. PubMed ID: 7167427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of absorbable suture materials in biliary tract surgery.
    Sugimachi K; Sufian S; Weiss MJ; Pavlides CA; Matsumoto T
    Int Surg; 1978 Mar; 63(3):135-9. PubMed ID: 415997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A comparative study of poly(glycolic acid) and catgut as suture materials. Histomorphology and mechanical properties.
    Pavan A; Bosio M; Longo T
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1979 May; 13(3):477-96. PubMed ID: 155699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Absorbable suture materials for vascular anastomoses. Tensile strength and axial pressure studies using polyglycolic acid sutures.
    Ross G; Pavlides C; Long F; Kusaba A; Perlman M; Matsumoto T
    Am Surg; 1981 Dec; 47(12):541-7. PubMed ID: 6274234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [In vivo studies on the tensile strength loss of absorbable synthetic threads].
    Thiede A; Lünstedt B; Sonntag HG
    Chirurg; 1980 Dec; 51(12):768-73. PubMed ID: 6258873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A comparison of the effect of pH on the biodegradation of two synthetic absorbable sutures.
    Chu CC
    Ann Surg; 1982 Jan; 195(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 6275809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. In vitro evaluation of five core materials.
    Gu S; Rasimick BJ; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17244304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Experimental comparison of Maxon and chromic catgut in suturing of the urinary bladder].
    Osterhage HR; Grün BR; Judmann G; Wünsch HP
    Urologe A; 1988 Jan; 27(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 3284147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Biomechanical and clinical performance of a new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture.
    Rodeheaver GT; Beltran KA; Green CW; Faulkner BC; Stiles BM; Stanimir GW; Traeland H; Fried GM; Brown HC; Edlich RF
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1996; 6(3-4):181-98. PubMed ID: 10167360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A comparative analysis of the biomechanical behaviour of five flexor tendon core sutures.
    Viinikainen A; Göransson H; Huovinen K; Kellomäki M; Rokkanen P
    J Hand Surg Br; 2004 Dec; 29(6):536-43. PubMed ID: 15542212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Sutures and suture anchors--update 2006.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Coons DA; Boothby MH
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Oct; 22(10):1063.e1-9. PubMed ID: 17027403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Suture material in vaginal hysterectomy].
    Tsuji A; Ohta C; Ohta Y
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Jan; 37(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 3973429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Repair of zone II flexor digitorum profundus lacerations using varying suture sizes: a comparative biomechanical study.
    Alavanja G; Dailey E; Mass DP
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 May; 30(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 15925150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of strength properties of poly-L/D-lactide (PLDLA) 96/4 and polyglyconate (Maxon) sutures: in vitro, in the subcutis, and in the achilles tendon of rabbits.
    Kangas J; Paasimaa S; Mäkelä P; Leppilahti J; Törmälä P; Waris T; Ashammakhi N
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2001; 58(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 11153008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A biomechanical comparison of suture constructs used for coracoclavicular fixation.
    Wickham MQ; Wyland DJ; Glisson RR; Speer KP
    J South Orthop Assoc; 2003; 12(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 14577722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Microbial adherence on various intraoral suture materials in patients undergoing dental surgery.
    Banche G; Roana J; Mandras N; Amasio M; Gallesio C; Allizond V; Angeretti A; Tullio V; Cuffini AM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Aug; 65(8):1503-7. PubMed ID: 17656275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures.
    Kim JC; Lee YK; Lim BS; Rhee SH; Yang HC
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2007 Dec; 18(12):2363-9. PubMed ID: 17569012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A comparison of a new polypropylene suture with Prolene.
    Chu CC; Pratt L; Zhang L; Hsu A; Chu A
    J Appl Biomater; 1993; 4(2):169-81. PubMed ID: 10148624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Tensile properties of synthetic, absorbable monofilament suture materials before and after incubation in phosphate-buffered saline.
    Tobias KM; Kidd CE; Mulon PY; Zhu X
    Vet Surg; 2020 Apr; 49(3):550-560. PubMed ID: 31599002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.