199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1989710)
21. Use of the Cytobrush for cervical sampling after cryotherapy.
Hoffman MS; Gordy LW; Cavanagh D
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 1994640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative yield of endocervical and metaplastic cells. Two sampling techniques: wooden spatula and cytology brush.
Lo L; Jordan J
Can Fam Physician; 1995 Sep; 41():1497-502. PubMed ID: 8520238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sampling accuracy of the modified Ayre spatula/Zelsmyr Cytobrush versus the modified Ayre spatula/bulb aspirator in the collection of cells from the uterine cervix.
Selvaggi SM; Malviya V
Diagn Cytopathol; 1991; 7(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 1879271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Improving the yield of endocervical elements in a Pap smear with the use of the cytology brush.
Ruffin MT; Van Noord GR
Fam Med; 1991 Jul; 23(5):365-9. PubMed ID: 1884932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparison of the three most common Papanicolaou smear collection techniques.
Germain M; Heaton R; Erickson D; Henry M; Nash J; O'Connor D
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 8041524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The efficiency of the cytobrush and cotton swab in obtaining endocervical cells in smears taken after conization of the cervix.
Kristensen GB; Jensen LK; Ejersbo D; Hølund B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1989; 246(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 2619334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The efficiency of the Cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells in cervical smears.
Trimbos JB; Arentz NP
Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 3521175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Endocervical brush versus cotton swab for obtaining cervical smears at a clinic. A cost comparison.
Harrison DD; Hernandez E; Dunton CJ
J Reprod Med; 1993 Apr; 38(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 8501736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cervical cytology with the Papette sampler.
Ferenczy A; Robitaille J; Guralnick M; Shatz R
J Reprod Med; 1994 Apr; 39(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 8040849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The value of the Cytobrush for obtaining cells from the uterine cervix.
Kawaguchi K; Nogi M; Ohya M; Nishikawa Y; Kobayashi TK
Diagn Cytopathol; 1987 Sep; 3(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 3665693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Endocervical detection of CIN. Cytobrush versus cotton.
Schettino F; Sideri M; Cangini L; Candiani M; Zannoni E; Maggi R; Ferrari A
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1993; 14(3):234-6. PubMed ID: 8508881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of cytobrush with cotton swab for endocervical cytologic sampling.
Neinstein LS; Rabinovitz S; Recalde A
J Adolesc Health Care; 1989 Jul; 10(4):305-7. PubMed ID: 2732111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The screening Papanicolaou smear: contribution of the endocervical brush.
Taylor PT; Andersen WA; Barber SR; Covell JL; Smith EB; Underwood PB
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):734-8. PubMed ID: 3658282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cervical cytology: a randomized comparison of four sampling methods.
McCord ML; Stovall TG; Meric JL; Summitt RL; Coleman SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 166(6 Pt 1):1772-7; discussion 1777-9. PubMed ID: 1615986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of two Papanicolaou smear techniques in a family practice setting.
Reissman SE
J Fam Pract; 1988 May; 26(5):525-9. PubMed ID: 3367117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Papanicolaou smear adequacy: the cervical cytobrush and Ayre spatula compared with the extended-tip spatula.
Noel ML
J Am Board Fam Pract; 1989; 2(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 2665423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.
Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC; Rietveld WJ
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A randomized comparison of the 3 Papanicolaou smear collection methods.
Kavak ZN; Eren F; Pekin S; Küllü S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Nov; 35(4):446-9. PubMed ID: 8717577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.
Boon ME; Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Rietveld-Scheffers PE
Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Sampling devices for the Papanicolaou test].
Broso P; Buffetti G; Sacco A
Minerva Ginecol; 1992 Sep; 44(9):441-7. PubMed ID: 1436619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
