BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19897985)

  • 1. Comparison of knee function after antegrade and retrograde intramedullary nailing for diaphyseal femoral fractures: results of isokinetic evaluation.
    Daglar B; Gungor E; Delialioglu OM; Karakus D; Ersoz M; Tasbas BA; Bayrakci K; Gunel U
    J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):640-4. PubMed ID: 19897985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Muscle function and functional outcome following standard antegrade reamed intramedullary nailing of isolated femoral shaft fractures.
    Helmy N; Jando VT; Lu T; Chan H; O'Brien PJ
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jan; 22(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 18176159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Results of femoral intramedullary nailing in patients who are obese versus those who are not obese: a prospective multicenter comparison study.
    Tucker MC; Schwappach JR; Leighton RK; Coupe K; Ricci WM
    J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Sep; 21(8):523-9. PubMed ID: 17805018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Limb malalignment and functional outcome after antegrade versus retrograde intramedullary nailing in distal femoral fractures.
    Salem KH; Maier D; Keppler P; Kinzl L; Gebhard F
    J Trauma; 2006 Aug; 61(2):375-81. PubMed ID: 16917453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective functional outcome and motion analysis evaluation of the hip abductors after femur fracture and antegrade nailing.
    Archdeacon M; Ford KR; Wyrick J; Paterno MV; Hampton S; Ludwig MB; Hewett TE
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jan; 22(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 18176158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of knee function in patients with a healed fracture of the femoral shaft fixed with retrograde and antegrade intramedullary nailing.
    Andrzejewski K; Panasiuk M; Grzegorzewski A; Synder M
    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2013 Oct; 15(5):395-405. PubMed ID: 24431251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors affecting the results of distal femoral fractures treated by retrograde intramedullary nailing.
    Kim JW; Oh CW; Kyung HS; Min WK; Yoon SH
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 23(11):1311-5. PubMed ID: 19968169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of effect of retrograde and antegrade approaches to interlocking nail fixation of femoral diaphyseal fractures on ipsilateral hip and knee joint motion.
    Toluse AM; Asuquo JE; Ikem IC; Esan O; Akinyoola AL
    West Afr J Med; 2014; 33(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 24872262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrograde femoral nailing and knee function.
    Murray P; Bergin P; Labropoulos P; Gunther S
    Orthopedics; 2008 Oct; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 19226019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison between locked intramedullary nailing and plate osteosynthesis in the management of adult forearm fractures].
    Ozkaya U; Kiliç A; Ozdoğan U; Beng K; Kabukçuoğlu Y
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2009; 43(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 19293611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures combined with neck or distal femur fractures. A retrospective review of 25 cases, with a follow-up of 36-150 months.
    Okcu G; Aktuglu K
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Dec; 123(10):544-50. PubMed ID: 13680274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparative study of antegrade and retrograde intramedullary nailing for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures].
    Li WY; Zhang BS; Zhang L; Zheng SH; Wang Sm
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 Mar; 22(3):199-201. PubMed ID: 19366103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anterior knee pain after tibial intramedullary nailing using a medial paratendinous approach.
    Song SY; Chang HG; Byun JC; Kim TY
    J Orthop Trauma; 2012 Mar; 26(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 22068208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term functional outcome following intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures.
    el Moumni M; Voogd EH; ten Duis HJ; Wendt KW
    Injury; 2012 Jul; 43(7):1154-8. PubMed ID: 22483542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrograde versus antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures.
    Ricci WM; Bellabarba C; Evanoff B; Herscovici D; DiPasquale T; Sanders R
    J Orthop Trauma; 2001; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 11265005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The outcome of closed, intramedullary exchange nailing with reamed insertion in the treatment of femoral shaft nonunions.
    Shroeder JE; Mosheiff R; Khoury A; Liebergall M; Weil YA
    J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):653-7. PubMed ID: 19897987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of the results of the treatment of humeral shaft fractures with antegrade locked intramedullary nailing and retrograde locked intramedullary nailing].
    Liu XH; Sun L; Jiang XY; Wang MY; Zhang LD
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 87(13):902-5. PubMed ID: 17650402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Avoidance of malreduction of proximal femoral shaft fractures with the use of a minimally invasive nail insertion technique (MINIT).
    Russell TA; Mir HR; Stoneback J; Cohen J; Downs B
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jul; 22(6):391-8. PubMed ID: 18594303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical evaluation of retrograde intramedullary stabilization for femoral fractures: the effect of fracture level.
    Goodwin R; Mahar AT; Oka R; Steinman S; Newton PO
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2007 Dec; 27(8):873-6. PubMed ID: 18209606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How comparable is so-called standard fracture fixation with an identical implant? A prospective experience with the antegrade femoral nail in South Africa and Europe.
    Gross T; Huettl T; Audigé L; Frey C; Monesi M; Seibert FJ; Messmer P
    Injury; 2010 Apr; 41(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 19900673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.