BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19898439)

  • 1. Courts upbraid USDA for 'lax review' of GM crops.
    Waltz E
    Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Nov; 27(11):970. PubMed ID: 19898439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Environmental regulation. U.S. courts say transgenic crops need tighter scrutiny.
    Charles D
    Science; 2007 Feb; 315(5815):1069. PubMed ID: 17322039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Agbiotech. USDA decides against new regulation of GM crops.
    Stokstad E
    Science; 2011 Feb; 331(6017):523. PubMed ID: 21292947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biotech crop rules get rewrite.
    Marris E
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7158):9. PubMed ID: 17805261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. National academy panel urges USDA to toughen reviews of transgenic plants.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Apr; 20(4):323-4. PubMed ID: 11923822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. GM crops: a continent divided.
    Masood E
    Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6964):224-6. PubMed ID: 14628018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the risks associated with new agricultural practices.
    Hails RS
    Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6898):685-8. PubMed ID: 12167875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. US courts thwart GM alfalfa and turf grass.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Apr; 25(4):367-8. PubMed ID: 17420729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flawed science underlies laws on transgenic crops.
    Sandermann H
    Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6949):613. PubMed ID: 12904760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risks of genetically engineered crops.
    Gurian-Sherman D
    Science; 2003 Sep; 301(5641):1845; author reply 1845. PubMed ID: 14512604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Drugs in crops (continued).
    Phillips GC
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jun; 22(6):655-6. PubMed ID: 15175676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constantly evolving safety assessment protocols for GM foods.
    Sesikeran B; Vasanthi S
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():241-4. PubMed ID: 18296346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. GM grass eludes outmoded USDA oversight.
    Waltz E
    Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Sep; 29(9):772-3. PubMed ID: 21904303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pharming in crop commodities.
    Stewart CN
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Nov; 26(11):1222-3. PubMed ID: 18997756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Out of bounds.
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7124):132-3. PubMed ID: 17215811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. GM crop data-agronomy and ecology in tandem.
    Stewart CN; Wheaton SK
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 11135511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biotech crops' seal of safety does not convince skeptics.
    Keogh B
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Apr; 104(7):498-501. PubMed ID: 22440678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Harmonize conflicting regulations for genetically engineered plants and animals.
    Nature; 2017 Jun; 546(7658):327-328. PubMed ID: 28617471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unintended effects in genetically modified crops: revealed by metabolomics?
    Rischer H; Oksman-Caldentey KM
    Trends Biotechnol; 2006 Mar; 24(3):102-4. PubMed ID: 16460820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Terminator no solution to gene flow.
    Shand H
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):775-6. PubMed ID: 12147996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.