These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19898709)
41. CAD/CAM guided surgery in implant dentistry. A review of software packages and step-by-step protocols for planning surgical guides. Scherer MD; Kattadiyil MT; Parciak E; Puri S Alpha Omegan; 2014; 107(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 24881445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study. Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The digital patient - Imaging science in dentistry. Vandenberghe B J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():S21-S26. PubMed ID: 29929585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Digital design of a surgical guide for placement of definitive implants before orthodontic treatment. Bayraktaroglu HC; Kim JS; Londono J; Baker PS J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 25935081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Cone-beam imaging in dentistry. White SC Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):628-37. PubMed ID: 18849696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Development of workflow for recording virtual bite in the planning of orthognathic operations. Nilsson J; Thor A; Kamer L Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 53(4):384-6. PubMed ID: 25631397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Options in virtual 3D, optical-impression-based planning of dental implants. Reich S; Kern T; Ritter L Int J Comput Dent; 2014; 17(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 25098158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology. van der Zel JM J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 18482361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A continuing and emerging diagnostic problem. Amet EM J Prosthodont; 2011 Apr; 20(3):167. PubMed ID: 21477253 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement. Jacobs R; Quirynen M Periodontol 2000; 2014 Oct; 66(1):203-13. PubMed ID: 25123769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Implant imaging for the dentist. Mupparapu M; Singer SR J Can Dent Assoc; 2004 Jan; 70(1):32. PubMed ID: 14709253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Impact of Matching Point Selections on Image Registration Accuracy between Optical Scan and Computed Tomography. Mai HY; Lee DH Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():3285431. PubMed ID: 32802841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Sometimes the old is still gold. Jafari SM J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jun; 67(6):1356-7. PubMed ID: 19446236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Preoperative radiological evaluation of missing single teeth: A review. Horner K; Shelley AM Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9 Suppl 1():S69-88. PubMed ID: 27314113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The use of 3-dimensional reconstructions to evaluate the anatomic relationship of the mandibular canal and impacted mandibular third molars. Friedland B; Donoff B; Dodson TB J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Aug; 66(8):1678-85. PubMed ID: 18634957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]