These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19898714)

  • 1. Estimation of visual shade matching errors with 2 shade guides.
    Oh WS; Koh IW; O'Brien WJ
    Quintessence Int; 2009; 40(10):833-6. PubMed ID: 19898714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system.
    Öngül D; Şermet B; Balkaya MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jul; 108(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 22765984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides.
    Hammad IA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 12589286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of different light sources on tooth shade selection.
    Śmielecka M; Dorocka-Bobkowska B
    Dent Med Probl; 2020; 57(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 32068979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols.
    Della Bona A; Barrett AA; Rosa V; Pinzetta C
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):276-81. PubMed ID: 19019420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical color match of porcelain visual shade-matching systems.
    Wee AG; Kang EY; Jere D; Beck FM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(6):351-7; discussion 358. PubMed ID: 16417829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual and instrumental shade matching using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas.
    Pecho OE; Ghinea R; Alessandretti R; Pérez MM; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2016 Jan; 32(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 26631341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A comparison of color space of Vitapan 3D-Master shade guides to nature teeth from Nanjing population].
    Zhou XL; Luo XP; Liu X
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 27(2):164-7, 171. PubMed ID: 19472880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Influence of Dental Shade Guides and Experience on the Accuracy of Shade Matching.
    Nakhaei M; Ghanbarzadeh J; Amirinejad S; Alavi S; Rajatihaghi H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jan; 17(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 27084858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of visual and instrumental color matching.
    Igiel C; Lehmann KM; Ghinea R; Weyhrauch M; Hangx Y; Scheller H; Paravina RD
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Sep; 29(5):303-308. PubMed ID: 28742283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coverage error of three conceptually different shade guide systems to vital unrestored dentition.
    Bayindir F; Kuo S; Johnston WM; Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):175-85. PubMed ID: 17854618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shade selection of primary maxillary anterior teeth in children using Vitapan classical shade guide.
    Chenchugopal M; Venumbaka NR; Vijayakumar P; Selvaraju G; Rajendran S; Elangovan A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):657-660. PubMed ID: 28169266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance assessment of dental shade guides.
    Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e15-20. PubMed ID: 19329240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Clinical Study Comparing the Maxillary Anterior Tooth Shade and Fabricated Crown Shade of the Western Uttar Pradesh Population to Commercial Shade Guides.
    Sinha T; Ranjan M; Chatterjee U; Sinha DK; Chaudhary A; Vijayan A
    Cureus; 2023 Mar; 15(3):e35719. PubMed ID: 37025718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo spectroradiometric evaluation of colour matching errors among five shade guides.
    Li Q; Yu H; Wang YN
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Jan; 36(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 18976272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: A clinical study.
    Liberato WF; Barreto IC; Costa PP; de Almeida CC; Pimentel W; Tiossi R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):271-275. PubMed ID: 30722987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching.
    Okubo SR; Kanawati A; Richards MW; Childress S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Dec; 80(6):642-8. PubMed ID: 9830067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Tooth color matching systems and communication with dental laboratory in indirect restorations: 2011 update].
    Ginzburg M; Gilboa I
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2012 Jan; 29(1):28-34, 64. PubMed ID: 22991874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade-matching apparatus.
    Paravina RD
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 12475156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of an anatomic dual-laminate composite resin shade guide.
    Magne P; Bruzi G; Carvalho AO; Giannini M; Maia HP
    J Dent; 2013 Aug; 41 Suppl 3():e80-6. PubMed ID: 23685035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.