These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19898714)

  • 21. Lightness, chroma and hue differences on visual shade matching.
    Pecho OE; Pérez MM; Ghinea R; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2016 Nov; 32(11):1362-1373. PubMed ID: 27614615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Metameric effect between natural teeth and the shade tabs of a shade guide.
    Corcodel N; Helling S; Rammelsberg P; Hassel AJ
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2010 Jun; 118(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 20572867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. New shade guide for tooth whitening monitoring: visual assessment.
    Paravina RD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 18319088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison between conventional visual and spectrophotometric methods for shade selection.
    Judeh A; Al-Wahadni A
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Oct; 40(9):e69-79. PubMed ID: 19862392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of two optical devices used for artificial tooth color selection.
    Śmielecka M; Dorocka-Bobkowska B
    Dent Med Probl; 2022; 59(2):249-253. PubMed ID: 35584297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Differences between the human eye and the spectrophotometer in the shade matching of tooth colour.
    Gómez-Polo C; Gómez-Polo M; Celemin-Viñuela A; Martínez Vázquez De Parga JA
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):742-5. PubMed ID: 24140995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Comparison of the color difference between teeth underwent cold light whitening and two kinds of shade guides].
    Xu YX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Jun; 50(3):543-546. PubMed ID: 29930427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Vitapan 3D-master shade guide showed no fluorescence emission.
    Lee YK; Yu B; Lim HN
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):742-6. PubMed ID: 23649056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating factors that affect the shade-matching ability of dentists, dental staff members and laypeople.
    Capa N; Malkondu O; Kazazoglu E; Calikkocaoglu S
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Jan; 141(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 20045824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of self shade matching ability of dental students using visual and instrumental means.
    Alsaleh S; Labban M; AlHariri M; Tashkandi E
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40 Suppl 1():e82-7. PubMed ID: 22306532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An analysis of an educational method to improve the shade-matching ability of dental students.
    Chakrabortty K; Wadkar A; Mustaffa HG; Gupta C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):815.e1-815.e9. PubMed ID: 33678442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Designing visually optimal shade guides.
    Analoui M; Papkosta E; Cochran M; Matis B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):371-6. PubMed ID: 15507911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Selecting VITA classical shades with the VITA 3D-master shade guide.
    Zenthöfer A; Wiesberg S; Hildenbrandt A; Reinelt G; Rammelsberg P; Hassel AJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(4):376-82. PubMed ID: 25010883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A clinical study to correlate maxillary anterior natural teeth with that of the commercially available acrylic and porcelain shade guides.
    Khurana PR; Thomas PV; Rao SV; Balamuragan R; Singh MP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):427-33. PubMed ID: 24171984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visual whiteness ranking of a Vitapan 3D Master shade guide by untrained assessors.
    Lath DL; Wildgoose DG; Guan H; Lilley TH; Smith RN; Brook AH
    J Clin Dent; 2006; 17(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 16838875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of background/surrounding area on accuracy of visual color matching.
    Dudea D; Gasparik C; Botos A; Alb F; Irimie A; Paravina RD
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jul; 20(6):1167-73. PubMed ID: 26459306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Shade matching performance of dental students with three various lighting conditions.
    Nakhaei M; Ghanbarzadeh J; Keyvanloo S; Alavi S; Jafarzadeh H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 23579903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of human raters and an intra-oral spectrophotometer.
    Browning WD; Chan DC; Blalock JS; Brackett MG
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):337-43. PubMed ID: 19544824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of visual shade determination and an intra-oral dental colourimeter.
    Yilmaz B; Karaagaclioglu L
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):789-94. PubMed ID: 18466278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Factors influencing the shade matching performance of dentists and dental technicians when using two different shade guides.
    Alomari M; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2011 Dec; 211(11):E23. PubMed ID: 22158197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.