These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19899165)

  • 1. Computational exploration of the network of sequence flow between protein structures.
    Cao B; Elber R
    Proteins; 2010 Mar; 78(4):985-1003. PubMed ID: 19899165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The network of sequence flow between protein structures.
    Meyerguz L; Kleinberg J; Elber R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Jul; 104(28):11627-32. PubMed ID: 17596339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reduced alphabet of prebiotic amino acids optimally encodes the conformational space of diverse extant protein folds.
    Solis AD
    BMC Evol Biol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):158. PubMed ID: 31362700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between sequence determinants of stability for two natural homologous proteins with different folds.
    Van Dorn LO; Newlove T; Chang S; Ingram WM; Cordes MH
    Biochemistry; 2006 Sep; 45(35):10542-53. PubMed ID: 16939206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Super folds, networks, and barriers.
    Burke S; Elber R
    Proteins; 2012 Feb; 80(2):463-70. PubMed ID: 22095563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A galaxy of folds.
    Alva V; Remmert M; Biegert A; Lupas AN; Söding J
    Protein Sci; 2010 Jan; 19(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19937658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of negative selection in protein evolution revealed through the energetics of the native state ensemble.
    Hoffmann J; Wrabl JO; Hilser VJ
    Proteins; 2016 Apr; 84(4):435-47. PubMed ID: 26800099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Filling-in void and sparse regions in protein sequence space by protein-like artificial sequences enables remarkable enhancement in remote homology detection capability.
    Mudgal R; Sowdhamini R; Chandra N; Srinivasan N; Sandhya S
    J Mol Biol; 2014 Feb; 426(4):962-79. PubMed ID: 24316367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Less is more: towards an optimal universal description of protein folds.
    Szustakowski JD; Kasif S; Weng Z
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():ii66-71. PubMed ID: 16204127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring the universe of protein structures beyond the Protein Data Bank.
    Cossio P; Trovato A; Pietrucci F; Seno F; Maritan A; Laio A
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Nov; 6(11):e1000957. PubMed ID: 21079678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Massive non-natural proteins structure prediction using grid technologies.
    Minervini G; Evangelista G; Villanova L; Slanzi D; De Lucrezia D; Poli I; Luisi PL; Polticelli F
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jun; 10 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S22. PubMed ID: 19534748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A similarity network approach for the analysis and comparison of protein sequence/structure sets.
    Valavanis I; Spyrou G; Nikita K
    J Biomed Inform; 2010 Apr; 43(2):257-67. PubMed ID: 20097308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Atomic interaction networks in the core of protein domains and their native folds.
    Soundararajan V; Raman R; Raguram S; Sasisekharan V; Sasisekharan R
    PLoS One; 2010 Feb; 5(2):e9391. PubMed ID: 20186337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The size distribution of protein families within different types of folds.
    Liu X; Lv B; Guo W
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2011 Mar; 406(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 21303659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Capturing protein sequence-structure specificity using computational sequence design.
    Mach P; Koehl P
    Proteins; 2013 Sep; 81(9):1556-70. PubMed ID: 23609941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Secondary structure switching in Cro protein evolution.
    Newlove T; Konieczka JH; Cordes MH
    Structure; 2004 Apr; 12(4):569-81. PubMed ID: 15062080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of the probabilities for evolutionary structural changes in protein folds.
    Viksna J; Gilbert D
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Apr; 23(7):832-41. PubMed ID: 17282999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structural genomics analysis: characteristics of atypical, common, and horizontally transferred folds.
    Hegyi H; Lin J; Greenbaum D; Gerstein M
    Proteins; 2002 May; 47(2):126-41. PubMed ID: 11933060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A role for indels in the evolution of Cro protein folds.
    Stewart KL; Nelson MR; Eaton KV; Anderson WJ; Cordes MH
    Proteins; 2013 Nov; 81(11):1988-96. PubMed ID: 23843258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simple intrasequence difference (SID) analysis: an original method to highlight and rank sub-structural interfaces in protein folds. Application to the folds of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor, phospholipase A2, chymotrypsin and carboxypeptidase A.
    Pritchard L; Cardle L; Quinn S; Dufton M
    Protein Eng; 2003 Feb; 16(2):87-101. PubMed ID: 12676977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.