These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19899357)

  • 1. Effects of in-car support on mental workload and driving performance of older drivers.
    Davidse RJ; Hagenzieker MP; van Wolffelaar PC; Brouwer WH
    Hum Factors; 2009 Aug; 51(4):463-76. PubMed ID: 19899357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intersection assistance: a safe solution for older drivers?
    Dotzauer M; Caljouw SR; de Waard D; Brouwer WH
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Oct; 59():522-8. PubMed ID: 23954686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Behavioral adaptation of young and older drivers to an intersection crossing advisory system.
    Dotzauer M; de Waard D; Caljouw SR; Pöhler G; Brouwer WH
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jan; 74():24-32. PubMed ID: 25463941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency and Quality of Exposure to Adaptive Cruise Control and Impact on Trust, Workload, and Mental Models.
    Pai G; Zhang F; Hungund AP; Pamarthi J; Roberts SC; Horrey WJ; Pradhan AK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107130. PubMed ID: 37336048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulator training with a forward collision warning system: effects on driver-system interactions and driver trust.
    Koustanaï A; Cavallo V; Delhomme P; Mas A
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):709-21. PubMed ID: 23156617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring drivers' mental workload and visual demand while using an in-vehicle HMI for eco-safe driving.
    Li X; Vaezipour A; Rakotonirainy A; Demmel S; Oviedo-Trespalacios O
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105756. PubMed ID: 32919220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Smart In-Vehicle Technologies and Older Drivers: A Scoping Review.
    Classen S; Jeghers M; Morgan-Daniel J; Winter S; King L; Struckmeyer L
    OTJR (Thorofare N J); 2019 Apr; 39(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 30791814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use patterns among early adopters of adaptive cruise control.
    Xiong H; Boyle LN; Moeckli J; Dow BR; Brown TL
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):722-33. PubMed ID: 23156618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aging: Older Adults' Driving Behavior Using Longitudinal and Lateral Warning Systems.
    Souders DJ; Charness N; Roque NA; Pham H
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):229-248. PubMed ID: 31361158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toward best practice in Human Machine Interface design for older drivers: A review of current design guidelines.
    Young KL; Koppel S; Charlton JL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():460-467. PubMed ID: 27374247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does automatic transmission improve driving behavior in older drivers?
    Selander H; Bolin I; Falkmer T
    Gerontology; 2012; 58(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 21865668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness evaluation of simulative workshops for newly licensed drivers.
    Rosenbloom T; Eldror E
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Feb; 63():30-6. PubMed ID: 24252555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Car drivers' perceptions of electronic stability control (ESC) systems.
    Vadeby A; Wiklund M; Forward S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):706-13. PubMed ID: 21376858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
    Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating advanced driver-assistance system trainings using driver performance, attention allocation, and neural efficiency measures.
    Zahabi M; Abdul Razak AM; Shortz AE; Mehta RK; Manser M
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Apr; 84():103036. PubMed ID: 31987518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of age and proximity warning devices on collision avoidance in simulated driving.
    Kramer AF; Cassavaugh N; Horrey WJ; Becic E; Mayhugh JL
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):935-49. PubMed ID: 17915608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Elderly and young driver's reaction to an in-car enforcement and tutoring system.
    de Waard D; van der Hulst M; Brookhuis KA
    Appl Ergon; 1999 Apr; 30(2):147-57. PubMed ID: 10098807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Driving responses of older and younger drivers in a driving simulator.
    Fildes B; Charlton J; Muir C; Koppel S
    Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2007; 51():559-72. PubMed ID: 18184513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Capturing the serial nature of older drivers' responses towards challenging events: a simulator study.
    Bélanger A; Gagnon S; Yamin S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 May; 42(3):809-17. PubMed ID: 20380907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of on-street parking and road environment visual complexity on travel speed and reaction time.
    Edquist J; Rudin-Brown CM; Lenné MG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():759-65. PubMed ID: 22269567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.