3144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19900250)
1. Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.
Coons SJ; Gwaltney CJ; Hays RD; Lundy JJ; Sloan JA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Cella D; Basch E;
Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):419-29. PubMed ID: 19900250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pediatric patient-reported outcome instruments for research to support medical product labeling: report of the ISPOR PRO good research practices for the assessment of children and adolescents task force.
Matza LS; Patrick DL; Riley AW; Alexander JJ; Rajmil L; Pleil AM; Bullinger M
Value Health; 2013 Jun; 16(4):461-79. PubMed ID: 23796280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of electronic systems to collect patient-reported outcome (PRO) data-recommendations for clinical trial teams: report of the ISPOR ePRO systems validation good research practices task force.
Zbrozek A; Hebert J; Gogates G; Thorell R; Dell C; Molsen E; Craig G; Grice K; Kern S; Hines S
Value Health; 2013 Jun; 16(4):480-9. PubMed ID: 23796281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PRO data collection in clinical trials using mixed modes: report of the ISPOR PRO mixed modes good research practices task force.
Eremenco S; Coons SJ; Paty J; Coyne K; Bennett AV; McEntegart D;
Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):501-16. PubMed ID: 25128043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: an ad hoc task force report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001.
Acquadro C; Berzon R; Dubois D; Leidy NK; Marquis P; Revicki D; Rothman M;
Value Health; 2003; 6(5):522-31. PubMed ID: 14627058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance.
; ;
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2006 Oct; 4():79. PubMed ID: 17034633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Updated Recommendations on Evidence Needed to Support Measurement Comparability Among Modes of Data Collection for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force.
O'Donohoe P; Reasner DS; Kovacs SM; Byrom B; Eremenco S; Barsdorf AI; Arnera V; Coons SJ
Value Health; 2023 May; 26(5):623-633. PubMed ID: 37121630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force Report.
Rothman M; Burke L; Erickson P; Leidy NK; Patrick DL; Petrie CD
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1075-83. PubMed ID: 19804437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices--budget impact analysis.
Mauskopf JA; Sullivan SD; Annemans L; Caro J; Mullins CD; Nuijten M; Orlewska E; Watkins J; Trueman P
Value Health; 2007; 10(5):336-47. PubMed ID: 17888098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement Equivalence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Migrated to Electronic Formats: A Review of Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Trials and Bring Your Own Device.
Byrom B; Gwaltney C; Slagle A; Gnanasakthy A; Muehlhausen W
Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2019 Jul; 53(4):426-430. PubMed ID: 30157687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Standards for Instrument Migration When Implementing Paper Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments Electronically: Recommendations from a Qualitative Synthesis of Cognitive Interview and Usability Studies.
Muehlhausen W; Byrom B; Skerritt B; McCarthy M; McDowell B; Sohn J
Value Health; 2018 Jan; 21(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 29304939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Equivalence of electronic and paper administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted between 2007 and 2013.
Muehlhausen W; Doll H; Quadri N; Fordham B; O'Donohoe P; Dogar N; Wild DJ
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2015 Oct; 13():167. PubMed ID: 26446159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using real-world data for coverage and payment decisions: the ISPOR Real-World Data Task Force report.
Garrison LP; Neumann PJ; Erickson P; Marshall D; Mullins CD
Value Health; 2007; 10(5):326-35. PubMed ID: 17888097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Criteria and Process for Initiating and Developing an ISPOR Good Practices Task Force Report.
Malone DC; Ramsey SD; Patrick DL; Johnson FR; Mullins CD; Roberts MS; Willke RJ; Marshall DA
Value Health; 2020 Apr; 23(4):409-415. PubMed ID: 32327155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and usability testing of an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) solution for patients with inflammatory diseases in an Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product (ATMP) basket trial.
McMullan C; Retzer A; Hughes SE; Aiyegbusi OL; Bathurst C; Boyd A; Coleman J; Davies EH; Denniston AK; Dunster H; Frost C; Harding R; Hunn A; Kyte D; Malpass R; McNamara G; Mitchell S; Mittal S; Newsome PN; Price G; Rowe A; van Reil W; Walker A; Wilson R; Calvert M
J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2023 Oct; 7(1):98. PubMed ID: 37812323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.
Husereau D; Drummond M; Petrou S; Carswell C; Moher D; Greenberg D; Augustovski F; Briggs AH; Mauskopf J; Loder E;
Value Health; 2013; 16(2):231-50. PubMed ID: 23538175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electronic versus paper-based assessment of health-related quality of life specific to HIV disease: reliability study of the PROQOL-HIV questionnaire.
Duracinsky M; Lalanne C; Goujard C; Herrmann S; Cheung-Lung C; Brosseau JP; Schwartz Y; Chassany O
J Med Internet Res; 2014 Apr; 16(4):e115. PubMed ID: 24769643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of the Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact (PAH-SYMPACT®) questionnaire: a new patient-reported outcome instrument for PAH.
McCollister D; Shaffer S; Badesch DB; Filusch A; Hunsche E; Schüler R; Wiklund I; Peacock A;
Respir Res; 2016 Jun; 17(1):72. PubMed ID: 27301413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient-reported outcome instrument selection: designing a measurement strategy.
Snyder CF; Watson ME; Jackson JD; Cella D; Halyard MY;
Value Health; 2007; 10 Suppl 2():S76-85. PubMed ID: 17995477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
