BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19901877)

  • 1. Comparison of interface pressures of three compression bandaging systems used on healthy volunteers.
    Jünger M; Ladwig A; Bohbot S; Haase H
    J Wound Care; 2009 Nov; 18(11):474, 476-80. PubMed ID: 19901877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of elasticity on subbandage pressure of three layer tubular compression bandages in healthy volunteers: a RCT.
    Weller C; Jolley D; Wolfe R; Myers K; McNeil J
    J Wound Care; 2010 Oct; 19(10):417, 420-3. PubMed ID: 20948489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the interface pressure and stiffness of four types of compression systems.
    Wong IK; Man MB; Chan OS; Siu FC; Abel M; Andriessen A
    J Wound Care; 2012 Apr; 21(4):161, 164, 166-7. PubMed ID: 22584673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of different sub-bandage pressure values on venous leg ulcers healing when treated with compression therapy.
    Milic DJ; Zivic SS; Bogdanovic DC; Jovanovic MM; Jankovic RJ; Milosevic ZD; Stamenkovic DM; Trenkic MS
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Mar; 51(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 20045611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protocol for a pilot randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of a graduated three layer straight tubular bandaging system when compared to a standard short stretch compression bandaging system in the management of people with venous ulceration: 3VSS2008.
    Weller CD; Evans S; Reid CM; Wolfe R; McNeil J
    Trials; 2010 Mar; 11():26. PubMed ID: 20214822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring sub-bandage pressure: comparing the use of pressure monitors and pulse oximeters.
    Satpathy A; Hayes S; Dodds SR
    J Wound Care; 2006 Mar; 15(3):125-8. PubMed ID: 16550667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compression stockings for treating venous leg ulcers: measurement of interface pressure under a new ulcer kit.
    Partsch B; Partsch H
    Phlebology; 2008; 23(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 18361269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multi-layer compression: comparison of four different four-layer bandage systems applied to the leg.
    Dale JJ; Ruckley CV; Gibson B; Brown D; Lee AJ; Prescott RJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2004 Jan; 27(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 14652845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Occupational leg oedema is more reduced by antigraduated than by graduated stockings.
    Mosti G; Partsch H
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2013 May; 45(5):523-7. PubMed ID: 23433949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of low-strength compression stockings with bandages for the treatment of recalcitrant venous ulcers.
    Brizzio E; Amsler F; Lun B; Blättler W
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Feb; 51(2):410-6. PubMed ID: 19879713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Loss of interface pressure in various compression bandage systems over seven days.
    Protz K; Heyer K; Verheyen-Cronau I; Augustin M
    Dermatology; 2014; 229(4):343-52. PubMed ID: 25412920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of inferface pressures of three compression bandage systems.
    Hanna R; Bohbot S; Connolly N
    Br J Nurs; 2008 Nov 13-26; 17(20):S16-24. PubMed ID: 19043323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interface pressure is affected by slippage of bandages at thigh.
    Miyazaki K; Hirai M; Koyama A; Iwata H; Ohashi M; Ota A
    Int Angiol; 2012 Dec; 31(6):544-9. PubMed ID: 23222932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different context, different results: venous ulcer healing and the use of two high-compression technologies.
    Nelson EA; Harrison MB;
    J Clin Nurs; 2014 Mar; 23(5-6):768-73. PubMed ID: 23845049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy, safety and acceptability of a new two-layer bandage system for venous leg ulcers.
    Benigni JP; Lazareth I; Parpex P; Gerard JL; Alves M; Vin F; Meaume S; Senet P; Allaert FA
    J Wound Care; 2007 Oct; 16(9):385-90. PubMed ID: 17987751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Case studies evaluating 3M's two-layer compression system: Coban 2.
    Hayes W; Day J
    Br J Community Nurs; 2008 Dec; 13(12):S14, S16, S18 passim. PubMed ID: 19060824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of sub-bandage pressures produced with two multi-layer bandaging systems.
    Taylor AD; Taylor RJ
    J Wound Care; 1999 Oct; 8(9):444-8. PubMed ID: 10818893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interface pressure and stiffness of ready made compression stockings: comparison of in vivo and in vitro measurements.
    Partsch H; Partsch B; Braun W
    J Vasc Surg; 2006 Oct; 44(4):809-14. PubMed ID: 17012005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ease of application of medical compression-stocking systems for the treatment of venous ulcers.
    Willenberg T; Lun B; Amsler F; Baumgartner I
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Jul; 40(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 20347350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of 4-Layer Bandages and an Adaptive Compression Therapy Device on Intended Pressure Delivery.
    Mayrovitz HN; Partsch H; Vanscheidt W
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2015; 42(5):468-73. PubMed ID: 26336043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.