160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19902148)
1. Is patient self-testing a good thing?
Oertel LB; Libby EN
J Thromb Thrombolysis; 2010 Feb; 29(2):214-8. PubMed ID: 19902148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Self-control of long-term oral anticoagulation using a point-of-care device.
Roudaut R
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2008; 101(11-12):683-4. PubMed ID: 19059561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of the point-of-care coagulometer CoaguChek XS in the hands of patients.
Nagler M; Raddatz-Müller P; Schmid P; Bachmann LM; Wuillemin WA
J Thromb Haemost; 2013 Jan; 11(1):197-9. PubMed ID: 23121888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Precision and accuracy of point-of-care testing coagulometers used for self-testing and self-management of oral anticoagulation therapy.
Christensen TD; Larsen TB
J Thromb Haemost; 2012 Feb; 10(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 22118602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Patient education in self management of his treatment].
Pilloud D; Gavin N; Schnetzler B
Soins; 2007 Jun; (716 Suppl):S6-10. PubMed ID: 17847594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. International normalized ratio self-testing and self-management: improving patient outcomes.
Pozzi M; Mitchell J; Henaine AM; Hanna N; Safi O; Henaine R
Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2016; 12():387-392. PubMed ID: 27785043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized trial comparing INR monitoring devices in patients with anticoagulation self-management: evaluation of a novel error-grid approach.
Hemkens LG; Hilden KM; Hartschen S; Kaiser T; Didjurgeit U; Hansen R; Bender R; Sawicki PT
J Thromb Thrombolysis; 2008 Aug; 26(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 17965836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of accuracy and clinical agreement of the CoaguChek XS portable device versus standard laboratory practice in unexperienced patients.
Torreiro EG; Fernández EG; Rodríguez RM; López CV; Núñez JB
Thromb Haemost; 2009 May; 101(5):969-74. PubMed ID: 19404552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct-to-patient expert system and home INR monitoring improves control of oral anticoagulation.
O'Shea SI; Arcasoy MO; Samsa G; Cummings SE; Thames EH; Surwit RS; Ortel TL
J Thromb Thrombolysis; 2008 Aug; 26(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 17616845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Generational performance of three point-of-care testing devices compared with standard laboratory measurement of the international normalised ratio across extended ranges.
Tay HM; Lai YF; Kong MC; See E; Yeang SH; Koh SK; Shim YT; Chan FSL; Wong WH; Liew CXY; Kaur H; Tan CW; Ho LP; Ng WY; Yeo CP; Ng HJ
J Clin Pathol; 2019 Apr; 72(4):311-315. PubMed ID: 30674539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the CoaguChek XS Plus system in a Swiss community setting.
Deom A; Reber G; Tsakiris DA; Hannes FM; Plesch W
Thromb Haemost; 2009 May; 101(5):988-90. PubMed ID: 19404558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of life in children participating in a non-selective INR self-monitoring VKA-education programme.
Amedro P; Bajolle F; Bertet H; Cheurfi R; Lasne D; Nogue E; Auquier P; Picot MC; Bonnet D
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2018 Mar; 111(3):180-188. PubMed ID: 29100908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anticoagulant monitoring in ventricular assist device patients: a feasibility study.
Joshi A; Smith D; Arora M; Poston R
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2008 Dec; 7(6):1035-8. PubMed ID: 18772265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New oral antithrombotics: a need for laboratory monitoring. For.
Mismetti P; Laporte S
J Thromb Haemost; 2010 Apr; 8(4):621-6. PubMed ID: 20102486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences in attitude, education, and knowledge about oral anticoagulation therapy among patients with atrial fibrillation in Europe: result of a self-assessment patient survey conducted by the European Heart Rhythm Association.
Hernández Madrid A; Potpara TS; Dagres N; Chen J; Larsen TB; Estner H; Todd D; Bongiorni MG; Sciaraffia E; Proclemer A; Cheggour S; Amara W; Blomstrom-Lundqvist C
Europace; 2016 Mar; 18(3):463-7. PubMed ID: 26899998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New oral antithrombotics: a need for laboratory monitoring. Against.
Bounameaux H; Reber G
J Thromb Haemost; 2010 Apr; 8(4):627-30. PubMed ID: 20088926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Home-made anticoagulation monitor vs. CoaguCheck-Plus monitoring of oral anticoagulation.
Finsterer J; Stöllberger C; Hopmeier P
Thromb Res; 2000 Jun; 98(6):571-5. PubMed ID: 10899356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Self-management of oral anticoagulation in the elderly: rationale, design, baselines and oral anticoagulation control after one year of follow-up. A randomized controlled trial.
Siebenhofer A; Rakovac I; Kleespies C; Piso B; Didjurgeit U
Thromb Haemost; 2007 Mar; 97(3):408-16. PubMed ID: 17334508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laboratory assessment of the anticoagulant effects of the next generation of oral anticoagulants.
Garcia D; Barrett YC; Ramacciotti E; Weitz JI
J Thromb Haemost; 2013 Feb; 11(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 23216682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anticoagulation early after mechanical valve replacement: improved management with patient self-testing.
Thompson JL; Burkhart HM; Daly RC; Dearani JA; Joyce LD; Suri RM; Schaff HV
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Sep; 146(3):599-604. PubMed ID: 22921821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
