These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19902152)

  • 1. [What can we learn from the Scott Reuben case? Scientific misconduct in anaesthesiology].
    Rittner HL; Kranke P; Schäfer M; Roewer N; Brack A
    Anaesthesist; 2009 Dec; 58(12):1199-209. PubMed ID: 19902152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perpetuation of Retracted Publications Using the Example of the Scott S. Reuben Case: Incidences, Reasons and Possible Improvements.
    Bornemann-Cimenti H; Szilagyi IS; Sandner-Kiesling A
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Aug; 22(4):1063-1072. PubMed ID: 26150092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Susceptibility to fraud in systematic reviews: lessons from the Reuben case.
    Marret E; Elia N; Dahl JB; McQuay HJ; Møiniche S; Moore RA; Straube S; Tramèr MR
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Dec; 111(6):1279-89. PubMed ID: 19934873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Fraudulent pain research: a hurt so deep nothing can alleviate it].
    Rama-Maceiras P; Ingelmo II; Fàbregas JN; Hernández-Palazón J
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2009; 56(6):372-9. PubMed ID: 19725345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peering into peer review: Galileo, ESP, Dr Scott Reuben, and advancing our professional evolution.
    Biddle C
    AANA J; 2011 Oct; 79(5):365-6. PubMed ID: 23256263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth.
    White C
    BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7511):281-8. PubMed ID: 16052022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
    Steen RG
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 21081306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhancing reproducibility: Failures from Reproducibility Initiatives underline core challenges.
    Mullane K; Williams M
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 138():7-18. PubMed ID: 28396196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology deals with fraudulent papers from paper mills.
    Seifert R
    Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol; 2021 Mar; 394(3):431-436. PubMed ID: 33547901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An analysis of retractions of papers authored by Scott Reuben, Joachim Boldt and Yoshitaka Fujii.
    McHugh UM; Yentis SM
    Anaesthesia; 2019 Jan; 74(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 30144024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?
    Claxton LD
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 589(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 15652224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
    Steen RG
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Figure errors, sloppy science, and fraud: keeping eyes on your data.
    Williams CL; Casadevall A; Jackson S
    J Clin Invest; 2019 Mar; 129(5):1805-1807. PubMed ID: 30907748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Academic fraud: perspectives from a lifelong anesthesia researcher.
    Mutch WA
    Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):782-4, 784-8. PubMed ID: 21643872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving biomedical journals' ethical policies: the case of research misconduct.
    Bosch X
    J Med Ethics; 2014 Sep; 40(9):644-6. PubMed ID: 24505117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Readers as research detectives.
    Gøtzsche PC
    Trials; 2009 Jan; 10():2. PubMed ID: 19128482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correcting the literature following fraudulent publication.
    Friedman PJ
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1416-9. PubMed ID: 2406474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliable References, Accountable Authors, and Steadfast Reviewers Mitigate Against Retracted Publications and Scientific Misconduct.
    Brand JC; Rossi MJ; Lubowitz JH
    Arthroscopy; 2017 Aug; 33(8):1435-1436. PubMed ID: 28779791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Fraud and misconduct in scientific publications].
    Matías-Guiu J; García-Ramos R
    Neurologia; 2010; 25(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 20388454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends in scientific publishing: Dark clouds loom large.
    Vinny PW; Vishnu VY; Lal V
    J Neurol Sci; 2016 Apr; 363():119-20. PubMed ID: 27000235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.