250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19902479)
1. Robot-assisted staging using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer: comparison to laparoscopy and laparotomy at a single institution.
Jung YW; Lee DW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim JH; Kim JW; Kim YT
J Surg Oncol; 2010 Feb; 101(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 19902479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible?
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):563-8. PubMed ID: 11733973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for the surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.
Wong CK; Wong YH; Lo LS; Tai CM; Ng TK
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Aug; 31(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 16018773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?
Eltabbakh GH; Shamonki MI; Moody JM; Garafano LL
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):329-35. PubMed ID: 10985889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy.
Boggess JF; Gehrig PA; Cantrell L; Shafer A; Ridgway M; Skinner EN; Fowler WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 199(4):360.e1-9. PubMed ID: 18928974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost analysis of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for early endometrial cancer.
Scribner DR; Mannel RS; Walker JL; Johnson GA
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Dec; 75(3):460-3. PubMed ID: 10600307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer.
Kuoppala T; Tomás E; Heinonen PK
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Jul; 270(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12728326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
Seamon LG; Fowler JM; Richardson DL; Carlson MJ; Valmadre S; Phillips GS; Cohn DE
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 19428096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy.
Holtz DO; Miroshnichenko G; Finnegan MO; Chernick M; Dunton CJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 20547112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer.
Coronado PJ; Herraiz MA; Magrina JF; Fasero M; Vidart JA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Dec; 165(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 22819573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic surgical staging for obese patients with endometrial cancer.
Tang KY; Gardiner SK; Gould C; Osmundsen B; Collins M; Winter WE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):513.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22409959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in stages I and II endometrial cancer. Operating data, follow up and survival.
Zapico A; Fuentes P; Grassa A; Arnanz F; Otazua J; Cortés-Prieto J
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Aug; 98(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 15982724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of robotics on practice management of endometrial cancer: transitioning from traditional surgery.
Hoekstra AV; Jairam-Thodla A; Rademaker A; Singh DK; Buttin BM; Lurain JR; Schink JC; Lowe MP
Int J Med Robot; 2009 Dec; 5(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 19455550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer.
ElSahwi KS; Hooper C; De Leon MC; Gallo TN; Ratner E; Silasi DA; Santin AD; Schwartz PE; Rutherford TJ; Azodi M
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Feb; 124(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 22036203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparative analysis of laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy for early stage endometrial cancer].
Peng P; Huang HF; Shen K; Pan LY; Wu M; Yang JX; Lang JH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 39(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 15130375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging.
Veljovich DS; Paley PJ; Drescher CW; Everett EN; Shah C; Peters WA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 198(6):679.e1-9; discussion 679.e9-10. PubMed ID: 18538151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection: analysis of the first 100 cases.
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Sep; 82(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 11520146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
