204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19903336)
1. Multivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with multiple thresholds.
Hamza TH; Arends LR; van Houwelingen HC; Stijnen T
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Nov; 9():73. PubMed ID: 19903336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.
Arends LR; Hamza TH; van Houwelingen JC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):621-38. PubMed ID: 18591542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.
Macaskill P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 15504635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of bivariate, multivariate random-effects, and Poisson correlated gamma-frailty models to meta-analyze individual patient data of ordinal scale diagnostic tests.
Simoneau G; Levis B; Cuijpers P; Ioannidis JPA; Patten SB; Shrier I; Bombardier CH; de Lima Osório F; Fann JR; Gjerdingen D; Lamers F; Lotrakul M; Löwe B; Shaaban J; Stafford L; van Weert HCPM; Whooley MA; Wittkampf KA; Yeung AS; Thombs BD; Benedetti A
Biom J; 2017 Nov; 59(6):1317-1338. PubMed ID: 28692782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analysis of full ROC curves using bivariate time-to-event models for interval-censored data.
Hoyer A; Hirt S; Kuss O
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 29052956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical methods for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic tests: An overview and tutorial.
Ma X; Nie L; Cole SR; Chu H
Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Aug; 25(4):1596-619. PubMed ID: 23804970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-analysis of full ROC curves with flexible parametric distributions of diagnostic test values.
Hoyer A; Kuss O
Res Synth Methods; 2020 Mar; 11(2):301-313. PubMed ID: 31953903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with SAS PROC GLIMMIX.
Menke J
Methods Inf Med; 2010; 49(1):54-62, 62-4. PubMed ID: 19936437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A mixed effect model for bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution.
Nikoloulopoulos AK
Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(29):3842-65. PubMed ID: 26234584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Associating explanatory variables with summary receiver operating characteristic curves in diagnostic meta-analysis.
Hamza TH; van Houwelingen HC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Stijnen T
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 62(12):1284-91. PubMed ID: 19398297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Meta-analysis and meta-modelling for diagnostic problems.
Charoensawat S; Böhning W; Böhning D; Holling H
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Apr; 14():56. PubMed ID: 24758534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
Reitsma JB; Glas AS; Rutjes AW; Scholten RJ; Bossuyt PM; Zwinderman AH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 16168343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Summary ROC curve based on a weighted Youden index for selecting an optimal cutpoint in meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.
Rücker G; Schumacher M
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3069-78. PubMed ID: 21170902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of non-invasive diagnostic testing strategies for deep vein thrombosis.
Goodacre S; Sampson F; Stevenson M; Wailoo A; Sutton A; Thomas S; Locker T; Ryan A
Health Technol Assess; 2006 May; 10(15):1-168, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16707072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Evaluation of Bivariate Mixed Models in Meta-analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies with SAS, Stata and R.
Vogelgesang F; Schlattmann P; Dewey M
Methods Inf Med; 2018 May; 57(3):111-119. PubMed ID: 29719917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Univariate and bivariate likelihood-based meta-analysis methods performed comparably when marginal sensitivity and specificity were the targets of inference.
Dahabreh IJ; Trikalinos TA; Lau J; Schmid CH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 83():8-17. PubMed ID: 28063915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary.
Harbord RM; Whiting P; Sterne JA; Egger M; Deeks JJ; Shang A; Bachmann LM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1095-103. PubMed ID: 19208372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Meta-analysis of ROC curves.
Kester AD; Buntinx F
Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(4):430-9. PubMed ID: 11059476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
