These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19903644)

  • 1. Vertical dimensional stability and rigidity of occlusal registration materials.
    Walker MP; Wu E; Heckman ME; Alderman N
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(5):514-8. PubMed ID: 19903644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study of the surface hardness and dimensional stability of several intermaxillary registration materials.
    Chai J; Tan E; Pang IC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):538-42. PubMed ID: 7748448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography.
    White AJ; Fallis DW; Vandewalle KS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 20362900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Materials for interocclusal records and their ability to reproduce a 3-dimensional jaw relationship.
    Ockert-Eriksson G; Eriksson A; Lockowandt P; Eriksson O
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11203625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal records.
    Vergos VK; Tripodakis AP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 12956489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials: dimensional accuracy, wettability, and effect on gypsum hardness.
    Panichuttra R; Jones RM; Goodacre C; Munoz CA; Moore BK
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 1810315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Polymerization shrinkage strain of interocclusal recording materials.
    Chun JH; Pae A; Kim SH
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 18614226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of 5 types of interocclusal recording materials on the accuracy of articulation of digital models.
    Sweeney S; Smith DK; Messersmith M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 26232833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surface quality and long-term dimensional stability of current elastomeric impression materials after disinfection.
    Walker MP; Rondeau M; Petrie C; Tasca A; Williams K
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 17559536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of glow-discharge and surfactant treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Erkut S; Can G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 15798686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interocclusal record fabricated with bis-acrylic composite resin and vinyl polysiloxane registration material.
    Vivas JL; Sierraalta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):199-200. PubMed ID: 19703631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using the neutral zone to obtain maxillomandibular relationship records for complete denture patients.
    Alfano SG; Leupold RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):621-3. PubMed ID: 11404763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The ability of different materials to reproduce accurate records of interocclusal relationships in the vertical dimension.
    Ghazal M; Albashaireh ZS; Kern M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):816-20. PubMed ID: 18482345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term dimensional stability and reproduction of surface detail of four polyvinyl siloxane duplicating materials.
    Pant R; Juszczyk AS; Clark RK; Radford DR
    J Dent; 2008 Jun; 36(6):456-61. PubMed ID: 18433976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure.
    Hosseinpour D; Berg JC
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Compressive strength of interocclusal recording materials.
    Keyf F; Altunsoy S
    Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 11210251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative evaluation of dimensional stability of three types of interocclusal recording materials-an in-vitro multi-centre study.
    Tejo SK; Kumar AG; Kattimani VS; Desai PD; Nalla S; Chaitanya K K
    Head Face Med; 2012 Oct; 8():27. PubMed ID: 23039395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.