These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19904297)

  • 21. Evolution of the environmental component of the phenotypic variance: stabilizing selection in changing environments and the cost of homogeneity.
    Zhang XS; Hill WG
    Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1237-44. PubMed ID: 16050100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genetic parameters and predicted selection results for maternal traits related to lactation efficiency in sows.
    Bergsma R; Kanis E; Verstegen MW; Knol EF
    J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1067-80. PubMed ID: 18192550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
    Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice.
    Jannink JL; Lorenz AJ; Iwata H
    Brief Funct Genomics; 2010 Mar; 9(2):166-77. PubMed ID: 20156985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impacts of QTL x environment interactions on genetic response to marker-assisted selection.
    Liu PY; Zhu J; Yan L
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 Jan; 33(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 16450589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evolution of genetic variation for selected traits in successive breeding populations of maritime pine.
    Bouffier L; Raffin A; Kremer A
    Heredity (Edinb); 2008 Aug; 101(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 18523446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Combining genetic test information and correlated phenotypic records for breeding value estimation.
    Spangler ML; Bertrand JK; Rekaya R
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Mar; 85(3):641-9. PubMed ID: 17085722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection.
    Pryce JE; Goddard ME; Raadsma HW; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5455-66. PubMed ID: 20965361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A stochastic simulation study on validation of an approximate multitrait model using preadjusted data for prediction of breeding values.
    Lassen J; Sørensen MK; Madsen P; Ducrocq V
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jun; 90(6):3002-11. PubMed ID: 17517742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mutation-selection balance accounting for genetic variation for viability in Drosophila melanogaster as deduced from an inbreeding and artificial selection experiment.
    Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; Pérez-Figueroa A; Fernández B; Fernández J; Caballero A
    J Evol Biol; 2004 May; 17(3):528-41. PubMed ID: 15149396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biochemical and genetic polymorphisms for carboxylesterase and acetylesterase in grape clones of Vitis vinifera L. (Vitaceae) cultivars.
    Orasmo GR; Oliveira-Collet SA; Lapenta AS; de Fátima P S Machado M
    Biochem Genet; 2007 Oct; 45(9-10):663-70. PubMed ID: 17710528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.).
    Bouquet A; Torregrosa L; Iocco P; Thomas MR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2006; 344():273-85. PubMed ID: 17033070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Exploring the genetic variability in water use efficiency: Evaluation of inter and intra cultivar genetic diversity in grapevines.
    Tortosa I; Escalona JM; Bota J; Tomás M; Hernández E; Escudero EG; Medrano H
    Plant Sci; 2016 Oct; 251():35-43. PubMed ID: 27593461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inter-block information: to recover or not to recover it?
    Möhring J; Williams E; Piepho HP
    Theor Appl Genet; 2015 Aug; 128(8):1541-54. PubMed ID: 25972114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Rich stimulus sampling for between-subjects designs improves model selection.
    Young ME; Cole JJ; Sutherland SC
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Mar; 44(1):176-88. PubMed ID: 21761262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Efficient Assessment and Large-Scale Conservation of Intra-Varietal Diversity of Ancient Grapevine Varieties: Case Study Portugal.
    Gonçalves E; Martins A
    Plants (Basel); 2022 Jul; 11(15):. PubMed ID: 35893621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Selection system efficiencies for computer simulated progeny test field designs in loblolly pine.
    Loo-Dinkins JA; Tauer CG; Lambeth CC
    Theor Appl Genet; 1990 Jan; 79(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 24226125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Selection during a selfing programme. I. The effects of a single round of selection.
    Cornish MA
    Heredity (Edinb); 1990 Oct; 65 ( Pt 2)():201-11. PubMed ID: 2272849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prediction of genetic gain in finite populations with heterogeneous predicted breeding values accuracies.
    Elsen JM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Dec; 133(6):493-502. PubMed ID: 27282984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.