These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19904875)
1. The 2009 EHR user satisfaction survey: responses from 2,012 family physicians. Edsall RL; Adler KG Fam Pract Manag; 2009; 16(6):10-6. PubMed ID: 19904875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The 2011 EHR User Satisfaction Survey: responses from 2,719 family physicians. Edsall RL; Adler KG Fam Pract Manag; 2011; 18(4):23-30. PubMed ID: 21842823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An EHR user-satisfaction survey: advice from 408 family physicians. Edsall RL; Adler KG Fam Pract Manag; 2005 Oct; 12(9):29-35. PubMed ID: 16296595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Getting more from a voice recognition system. Knight MJ Fam Pract Manag; 2001 Mar; 8(3):55-6. PubMed ID: 11317851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The patient centred medical home - a new model of practice in the USA. Kellerman R Aust Fam Physician; 2009 May; 38(5):279. PubMed ID: 19458794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toward a modular EHR. Kibbe DC Fam Pract Manag; 2009; 16(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 19621865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Systems integration: does it benefit the physician user? Martin CL Healthc Inform; 1994 May; 11(5):84. PubMed ID: 10134315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Human-computer interaction reflected in the design of user interfaces for general practitioners. Stoicu-Tivadar L; Stoicu-Tivadar V Int J Med Inform; 2006; 75(3-4):335-42. PubMed ID: 16188492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: a time-motion study. Pizziferri L; Kittler AF; Volk LA; Honour MM; Gupta S; Wang S; Wang T; Lippincott M; Li Q; Bates DW J Biomed Inform; 2005 Jun; 38(3):176-88. PubMed ID: 15896691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. User interface of MUDR electronic health record. Hanzlicek P; Spidlen J; Heroutova H; Nagy M Int J Med Inform; 2005 Mar; 74(2-4):221-7. PubMed ID: 15694628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Positive collaboration integral to EHR use. Culver CL Nurs Manage; 2005 Oct; 36(10):12. PubMed ID: 16210944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electronic health record components and the quality of care. Keyhani S; Hebert PL; Ross JS; Federman A; Zhu CW; Siu AL Med Care; 2008 Dec; 46(12):1267-72. PubMed ID: 19300317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sharable EHR systems in Finland. Harno K; Ruotsalainen P Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 121():364-70. PubMed ID: 17095834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship between use of electronic health record features and health care quality: results of a statewide survey. Poon EG; Wright A; Simon SR; Jenter CA; Kaushal R; Volk LA; Cleary PD; Singer JA; Tumolo AZ; Bates DW Med Care; 2010 Mar; 48(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 20125047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EHR satisfaction in large medical groups. Drummond H Fam Pract Manag; 2010; 17(5):9; author reply 9. PubMed ID: 21121563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Response to the Connecticut 2009 Primary Care Survey. Volpintesta EJ Conn Med; 2010; 74(6):375. PubMed ID: 20648852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical documentation: the handheld computer as a survival tool. Wofford MM; Secan R; Herman C; Moran WP; Wofford JL MD Comput; 1998; 15(6):352-4, 356, 358. PubMed ID: 9846058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]