These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19905740)

  • 1. Tight noise thresholds for quantum computation with perfect stabilizer operations.
    van Dam W; Howard M
    Phys Rev Lett; 2009 Oct; 103(17):170504. PubMed ID: 19905740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exact two-qubit universal quantum circuit.
    Zhang J; Vala J; Sastry S; Whaley KB
    Phys Rev Lett; 2003 Jul; 91(2):027903. PubMed ID: 12906510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Classification of topologically protected gates for local stabilizer codes.
    Bravyi S; König R
    Phys Rev Lett; 2013 Apr; 110(17):170503. PubMed ID: 23679695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Practical scheme for quantum computation with any two-qubit entangling gate.
    Bremner MJ; Dawson CM; Dodd JL; Gilchrist A; Harrow AW; Mortimer D; Nielsen MA; Osborne TJ
    Phys Rev Lett; 2002 Dec; 89(24):247902. PubMed ID: 12484981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Thresholds for Universal Concatenated Quantum Codes.
    Chamberland C; Jochym-O'Connor T; Laflamme R
    Phys Rev Lett; 2016 Jul; 117(1):010501. PubMed ID: 27419549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fault-tolerant conversion between the Steane and Reed-Muller quantum codes.
    Anderson JT; Duclos-Cianci G; Poulin D
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Aug; 113(8):080501. PubMed ID: 25192082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the robustness of the hybrid qubit computational gates through simulated randomized benchmarking protocols.
    Ferraro E; De Michielis M
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17780. PubMed ID: 33082407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Universal quantum gate set approaching fault-tolerant thresholds with superconducting qubits.
    Chow JM; Gambetta JM; Córcoles AD; Merkel ST; Smolin JA; Rigetti C; Poletto S; Keefe GA; Rothwell MB; Rozen JR; Ketchen MB; Steffen M
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Aug; 109(6):060501. PubMed ID: 23006254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementing arbitrary phase gates with Ising anyons.
    Bonderson P; Clarke DJ; Nayak C; Shtengel K
    Phys Rev Lett; 2010 May; 104(18):180505. PubMed ID: 20482161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Demonstration of controlled-NOT quantum gates on a pair of superconducting quantum bits.
    Plantenberg JH; de Groot PC; Harmans CJ; Mooij JE
    Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7146):836-9. PubMed ID: 17568742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved Classical Simulation of Quantum Circuits Dominated by Clifford Gates.
    Bravyi S; Gosset D
    Phys Rev Lett; 2016 Jun; 116(25):250501. PubMed ID: 27391708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantifying magic for multi-qubit operations.
    Seddon JR; Campbell ET
    Proc Math Phys Eng Sci; 2019 Jul; 475(2227):20190251. PubMed ID: 31423103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficient Classical Simulation of Clifford Circuits with Nonstabilizer Input States.
    Bu K; Koh DE
    Phys Rev Lett; 2019 Oct; 123(17):170502. PubMed ID: 31702253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental Implementation of Universal Nonadiabatic Geometric Quantum Gates in a Superconducting Circuit.
    Xu Y; Hua Z; Chen T; Pan X; Li X; Han J; Cai W; Ma Y; Wang H; Song YP; Xue ZY; Sun L
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Jun; 124(23):230503. PubMed ID: 32603172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Noise tailoring for quantum circuits via unitary 2t-design.
    Zhang L; Yu Y; Zhu C; Pei C
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1790. PubMed ID: 30741965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficient measurement of quantum gate error by interleaved randomized benchmarking.
    Magesan E; Gambetta JM; Johnson BR; Ryan CA; Chow JM; Merkel ST; da Silva MP; Keefe GA; Rothwell MB; Ohki TA; Ketchen MB; Steffen M
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Aug; 109(8):080505. PubMed ID: 23002731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Demonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-NOT gate.
    O'Brien JL; Pryde GJ; White AG; Ralph TC; Branning D
    Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6964):264-7. PubMed ID: 14628045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental estimation of average fidelity of a Clifford gate on a 7-qubit quantum processor.
    Lu D; Li H; Trottier DA; Li J; Brodutch A; Krismanich AP; Ghavami A; Dmitrienko GI; Long G; Baugh J; Laflamme R
    Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Apr; 114(14):140505. PubMed ID: 25910102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantum advantage of unitary Clifford circuits with magic state inputs.
    Yoganathan M; Jozsa R; Strelchuk S
    Proc Math Phys Eng Sci; 2019 May; 475(2225):20180427. PubMed ID: 31236039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discording power of quantum evolutions.
    Galve F; Plastina F; Paris MG; Zambrini R
    Phys Rev Lett; 2013 Jan; 110(1):010501. PubMed ID: 23383765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.