153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19905853)
1. Accuracy and landmark error calculation using cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.
Grauer D; Cevidanes LS; Styner MA; Heulfe I; Harmon ET; Zhu H; Proffit WR
Angle Orthod; 2010 Mar; 80(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 19905853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms.
Chang ZC; Hu FC; Lai E; Yao CC; Chen MH; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):e289-97. PubMed ID: 22133963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of changing the head position on accuracy of transverse measurements of the maxillofacial region made on cone beam computed tomography and conventional posterior-anterior cephalograms.
Shokri A; Miresmaeili A; Farhadian N; Falah-Kooshki S; Amini P; Mollaie N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Jul; 46(5):20160180. PubMed ID: 28306330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.
Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of conventional versus cone-beam CT-synthesised lateral cephalograms for cephalometric analysis: A systematic review.
Raj G; Raj M; Saigo L
J Orthod; 2024 Jun; 51(2):160-176. PubMed ID: 37340975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of a programme of professional calibration in the variability of landmark identification using cone beam computed tomography-synthesized and conventional radiographic cephalograms.
Delamare EL; Liedke GS; Vizzotto MB; da Silveira HL; Ribeiro JL; Silveira HE
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):414-23. PubMed ID: 20841459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative analysis of angular cephalometric values between CBCT generated lateral cephalograms versus digitized conventional lateral cephalograms.
Chung RR; Lagravere MO; Flores-Mir C; Heo G; Carey JP; Major PW
Int Orthod; 2009 Dec; 7(4):308-21. PubMed ID: 20303918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study between conventional and cone beam CT-synthesized half and total skull cephalograms.
Liedke GS; Delamare EL; Vizzotto MB; da Silveira HL; Prietsch JR; Dutra V; da Silveira HE
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Feb; 41(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 22301638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of integration of dental cast and cephalograms compared with cone-beam computed tomography: a comparative study.
Dai F; Chen S; Feng T; Lu W; Chen G; Jiang J; Jiang R; Lin J; Han B; Xu T
Odontology; 2023 Jan; 111(1):238-247. PubMed ID: 35945305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of the reproducibility of landmark identification on posteroanterior and anteroposterior cephalograms generated from cone-beam computed tomography scans.
Na ER; Aljawad H; Lee KM; Hwang HS
Korean J Orthod; 2019 Jan; 49(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 30603624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements performed in full and hemifacial reconstructions derived from cone beam computed tomography.
Ramírez-Sotelo LR; Almeida S; Ambrosano GM; Bóscolo F
Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):827-32. PubMed ID: 22332664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of linear measurements using three imaging modalities: two lateral cephalograms and one 3D model from CBCT data.
Pittayapat P; Bornstein MM; Imada TS; Coucke W; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 25161199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.
Cattaneo PM; Bloch CB; Calmar D; Hjortshøj M; Melsen B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):798-802. PubMed ID: 19061807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) - generated frontal cephalograms.
Kim SJ; Park SB; Kim YI; Cho BH; Hwang DS
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e331-6. PubMed ID: 22444351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cone-beam computed tomography: accuracy of three-dimensional cephalometry analysis and influence of patient scanning position.
Frongia G; Piancino MG; Bracco P
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 23(4):1038-43. PubMed ID: 22777473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the reliability of measurements in cephalograms generated from cone beam computed tomography.
da Silva MB; Gois BC; Sant'Anna EF
Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(4):53-60. PubMed ID: 24262417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.
Lagravère MO; Low C; Flores-Mir C; Chung R; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 20451778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
