These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
47. Three-dimensional cephalometry: a method for the identification and for the orientation of the skull after cone-bean computed tomographic scan. Frongia G; Bracco P; Piancino MG J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):e308-11. PubMed ID: 23715002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Evaluation and comparison of postero-anterior cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography images for the detection of mandibular asymmetry. Damstra J; Fourie Z; Ren Y Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 21459833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The validity of transverse intermaxillary analysis by traditional PA cephalometry compared with cone-beam computed tomography. Cheung G; Goonewardene MS; Islam SM; Murray K; Koong B Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 23785942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography scans. Schlicher W; Nielsen I; Huang JC; Maki K; Hatcher DC; Miller AJ Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 21385857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Hilgers ML; Scarfe WC; Scheetz JP; Farman AG Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):803-11. PubMed ID: 16360924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Influence of Head Motion on the Accuracy of 3D Reconstruction with Cone-Beam CT: Landmark Identification Errors in Maxillofacial Surface Model. Lee KM; Song JM; Cho JH; Hwang HS PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153210. PubMed ID: 27065238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Evaluation of ponticulus posticus on digital lateral cephalograms and cone beam computed tomography in patients with migraine and healthy individuals: a comparative study. Sabir H; Kumbhare S; Rout P Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Sep; 118(3):348-54. PubMed ID: 25151589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study. Ghoneima A; Albarakati S; Baysal A; Uysal T; Kula K Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 23304973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. In vivo comparison of MRI- and CBCT-based 3D cephalometric analysis: beginning of a non-ionizing diagnostic era in craniomaxillofacial imaging? Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Weber D; Jende JME; Saleem MA; Zingler S; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 31802215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison between two-dimensional and midsagittal three-dimensional cephalometric measurements of dry human skulls. Damstra J; Fourie Z; Ren Y Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 49(5):392-5. PubMed ID: 20615593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A comparative study of lateral cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomographic images in upper airway assessment. Vizzotto MB; Liedke GS; Delamare EL; Silveira HD; Dutra V; Silveira HE Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):390-3. PubMed ID: 21398319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Effect of intended manual condylar positioning on skeletal and dental changes in Skeletal Class III deformities: CBCT-generated half-cephalograms. Hwang DS; Kim YI; Lee KM J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 42(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 23434240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]