These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19905858)

  • 1. The role of the posed smile in overall facial esthetics.
    Havens DC; McNamara JA; Sigler LM; Baccetti T
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Mar; 80(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 19905858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Q-sort assessment vs visual analog scale in the evaluation of smile esthetics.
    Schabel BJ; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4 Suppl):S61-71. PubMed ID: 19362268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of the gingival display on posed smile with different facial forms: a comparison of dentists and patients concepts.
    Akhare PJ; Daga A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 23422598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the influence of dental and facial aesthetics in determining overall attractiveness.
    Prasad KN; Sabrish S; Mathew S; Shivamurthy PG; Pattabiraman V; Sagarkar R
    Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):684-697. PubMed ID: 30385289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
    Shafiee R; Korn EL; Pearson H; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 18405813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Smile attractiveness related to buccal corridor space in 3 different facial types: A perception of 3 ethnic groups of Malaysians.
    Nimbalkar S; Oh YY; Mok RY; Tioh JY; Yew KJ; Patil PG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):252-256. PubMed ID: 29551374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between different levels of facial attractiveness and malocclusion perception: an eye tracking and survey study.
    Zorlu M; Camcı H
    Prog Orthod; 2023 Aug; 24(1):29. PubMed ID: 37599306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Smile attractiveness perception regarding buccal corridor size among different facial types.
    Mollabashi V; Abolvardi M; Akhlaghian M; Ghaffari MI
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(3):305-312. PubMed ID: 30328309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dentogingival Alterations and Their Influence on Facial and Smile Attractiveness.
    Malheiros AS; Brito AC; Gurgel JA; Bandeca MC; Borges AH; Hayashida TM; Filho EM; Tavarez RRJ
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1322-1328. PubMed ID: 30602635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of dental midline angulation towards the facial flow curve on the esthetics of an asymmetric face: Perspective of laypeople and orthodontists.
    Ntovas P; Karkazi F; Ozbilen EO; Lysy J; Gogolas N; Yilmaz HN; Papazoglou E; Coachman C
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 May; 36(5):778-784. PubMed ID: 38059402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective assessment of the contribution of dental esthetics and facial attractiveness in men via eye tracking.
    Baker RS; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel SF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):523-533. PubMed ID: 29602344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subjective and objective evaluation of frontal smile esthetics in patients with facial asymmetry-a comparative cross-sectional study.
    Singh H; Maurya RK; Kapoor P; Sharma P; Srivastava D
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Feb; 20(1):8-20. PubMed ID: 27862935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in smile parameters as perceived by orthodontists, dentists, artists, and laypeople.
    Gul-e-Erum ; Fida M
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 18575307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two scales for evaluation of smile and dental attractiveness.
    Oliveira PL; Motta AF; Guerra CJ; Mucha JN
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):42-8. PubMed ID: 25992986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. . Facial attractiveness: ranking of end-of-treatment facial photographs by pairs of Chinese and US orthodontists.
    Xu TM; Korn EL; Liu Y; Oh HS; Lee KH; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 18617106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Smile esthetics from patients' perspectives for faces of varying attractiveness.
    Chang CA; Fields HW; Beck FM; Springer NC; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel S; Christensen JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):e171-80. PubMed ID: 21967955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are ratings of dentofacial attractiveness influenced by dentofacial midline discrepancies?
    Shyagali TR; Chandralekha B; Bhayya DP; Kumar S; Balasubramanyam G
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 19113072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Upper canine inclination influences the aesthetics of a smile.
    Bothung C; Fischer K; Schiffer H; Springer I; Wolfart S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Feb; 42(2):144-52. PubMed ID: 25244536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does the presence of unilateral maxillary incisor edge asymmetries influence the perception of smile esthetics?
    Betrine Ribeiro J; Alecrim Figueiredo B; Wilson Machado A
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Jul; 29(4):291-297. PubMed ID: 28556552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.