These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19906164)
41. In vitro evaluation of sun protection factors of sunscreen agents using a novel UV spectrophotometric technique. Bleasel MD; Aldous S Int J Cosmet Sci; 2008 Aug; 30(4):259-70. PubMed ID: 18713072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Determination of UVA protection factors using the persistent pigment darkening (PPD) as the end point. (Part 1). Calibration of the method. Moyal D; Chardon A; Kollias N Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2000 Dec; 16(6):245-9. PubMed ID: 11132126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. p53 labeling index in assessing the efficacy of a sunscreen in protection against UV-induced damage. Lens M; Bielfeldt S; Bataille V; Wilhelm KP Int J Dermatol; 2008 Dec; 47(12):1234-9. PubMed ID: 19126007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Are cosmetic products which include an SPF appropriate for daily use? Séhédic D; Hardy-Boismartel A; Couteau C; Coiffard LJ Arch Dermatol Res; 2009 Sep; 301(8):603-8. PubMed ID: 19543900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The relative importance of the components used for ultraviolet A protection in broad-spectrum sunscreens. Deleu H; Maes A; Roelandts R Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 1992 Feb; 9(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 1390120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Ultraviolet A radiation: testing and labeling for sunscreen products. Nash JF; Tanner PR; Matts PJ Dermatol Clin; 2006 Jan; 24(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 16311168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Commentary on 'UVB-SPF': the SPF labels of sunscreen products convey more than just UVB protection. Sayre RM; Dowdy JC; Lott DL; Marlowe E Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2008 Aug; 24(4):218-20. PubMed ID: 18717963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. In vivo assessment of pigmentary and vascular compartments changes in UVA exposed skin by reflectance-mode confocal microscopy. Yamashita T; Akita H; Astner S; Miyakawa M; Lerner EA; González S Exp Dermatol; 2007 Nov; 16(11):905-11. PubMed ID: 17927573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. An in vivo method to assess the photostability of UV filters in a sunscreen. Cambon M; Issachar N; Castelli D; Robert C J Cosmet Sci; 2001; 52(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 11382839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Non-invasive monitoring of oxidative skin stress by ultraweak photon emission measurement. II: biological validation on ultraviolet A-stressed skin. Hagens R; Khabiri F; Schreiner V; Wenck H; Wittern KP; Duchstein HJ; Mei W Skin Res Technol; 2008 Feb; 14(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18211609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Importance of sunscreen products spreading protocol and substrate roughness for in vitro sun protection factor assessment. Fageon L; Moyal D; Coutet J; Candau D Int J Cosmet Sci; 2009 Dec; 31(6):405-18. PubMed ID: 19627381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Changes in ultraviolet absorbance and hence in protective efficacy against lipid peroxidation of organic sunscreens after UVA irradiation. Damiani E; Rosati L; Castagna R; Carloni P; Greci L J Photochem Photobiol B; 2006 Mar; 82(3):204-13. PubMed ID: 16442301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. UVA protection efficacy of sunscreens can be determined by the persistent pigment darkening (PPD) method. (Part 2). Moyal D; Chardon A; Kollias N Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2000 Dec; 16(6):250-5. PubMed ID: 11132127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Rationale for sunscreen development. Forestier S J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 May; 58(5 Suppl 2):S133-8. PubMed ID: 18410799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of sun protection factors determined by an in vivo and different in vitro methodologies: a study with 58 different commercially available sunscreen products. Heinrich U; Tronnier H; Kockott D; Kuckuk R; Heise HM Int J Cosmet Sci; 2004 Apr; 26(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 18494916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Sunscreen remanence on the skin: a noninvasive real time in vivo spectral analysis assessing the quenching of specular ultraviolet A light reflectance. Piérard GE; Khazaka D; Khazaka G J Cosmet Dermatol; 2016 Mar; 15(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 26260120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effectiveness of different substrate materials for in vitro sunscreen tests. Garoli D; Pelizzo MG; Nicolosi P; Peserico A; Tonin E; Alaibac M J Dermatol Sci; 2009 Nov; 56(2):89-98. PubMed ID: 19700264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of UVA protection afforded by high sun protection factor sunscreens. Bissonnette R; Allas S; Moyal D; Provost N J Am Acad Dermatol; 2000 Dec; 43(6):1036-8. PubMed ID: 11100019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Melanin differentially protects from the initiation and progression of threshold UV-induced erythema depending on UV waveband. Phan TA; Halliday GM; Barnetson RS; Damian DL Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2006 Aug; 22(4):174-80. PubMed ID: 16869864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Foundations and self-tanning products: Do they provide any protection from the sun? Choquenet B; Couteau C; Paparis E; Coiffard LJ J Dermatol; 2009 Nov; 36(11):587-91. PubMed ID: 19878391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]