222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19906370)
1. The comparison of two classifications for trochanteric femur fractures: the AO/ASIF classification and the Jensen classification.
van Embden D; Rhemrev SJ; Meylaerts SA; Roukema GR
Injury; 2010 Apr; 41(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 19906370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The value of CT compared to radiographs in the classification and treatment plan of trochanteric fractures.
van Embden D; Scheurkogel MM; Schipper IB; Rhemrev SJ; Meylaerts SA
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Aug; 136(8):1091-7. PubMed ID: 27365082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Classification of trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur: a study of the reliability of current systems.
Pervez H; Parker MJ; Pryor GA; Lutchman L; Chirodian N
Injury; 2002 Oct; 33(8):713-5. PubMed ID: 12213423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do thoraco-lumbar spinal injuries classification systems exhibit lower inter- and intra-observer agreement than other fractures classifications?: A comparison using fractures of the trochanteric area of the proximal femur as contrast model.
Urrutia J; Zamora T; Klaber I; Carmona M; Palma J; Campos M; Yurac R
Injury; 2016 Apr; 47(4):859-64. PubMed ID: 26653269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter and intra-observer agreement evaluation of the AO and the Tronzo classification systems of fractures of the trochanteric area.
Urrutia J; Zamora T; Besa P; Zamora M; Schweitzer D; Klaber I
Injury; 2015; 46(6):1054-8. PubMed ID: 25818057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric femoral fractures.
Schipper IB; Steyerberg EW; Castelein RM; van Vugt AB
Acta Orthop Scand; 2001 Feb; 72(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 11327411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of inter- and intra-observer reliability of current classification systems for subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
İmerci A; Aydogan NH; Tosun K
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Apr; 28(3):499-502. PubMed ID: 29110093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Classification of femur trochanteric fracture: Evaluating the reliability of Tang classification.
Yin B; He Y; Wang D; Zhou J
Injury; 2021 Jun; 52(6):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 33280893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT scan does not improve the reproducibility of trochanteric fracture classification: a prospective observational study of 53 cases.
Cavaignac E; Lecoq M; Ponsot A; Moine A; Bonnevialle N; Mansat P; Sans N; Bonnevialle P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Feb; 99(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 23270721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional CT Improves the Reproducibility of Stability Evaluation for Intertrochanteric Fractures.
Cho YC; Lee PY; Lee CH; Chen CH; Lin YM
Orthop Surg; 2018 Aug; 10(3):212-217. PubMed ID: 30152606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Classifying intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur: does experience matter?
Fung W; Jonsson A; Buhren V; Bhandari M
Med Princ Pract; 2007; 16(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 17409754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of the classification of proximal femur fractures: Does clinical experience matter?
Crijns TJ; Janssen SJ; Davis JT; Ring D; Sanchez HB;
Injury; 2018 Apr; 49(4):819-823. PubMed ID: 29549969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The new AO classification system for intertrochanteric fractures allows better agreement than the original AO classification. An inter- and intra-observer agreement evaluation.
Klaber I; Besa P; Sandoval F; Lobos D; Zamora T; Schweitzer D; Urrutia J
Injury; 2021 Jan; 52(1):102-105. PubMed ID: 32654847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Traction images heavily influence lateral wall measurement in trochanteric hip fractures. A prospective study.
Carmona M; Gonzalez N; Segovia J; de Amesti M; Zamora T; Schweitzer D
Injury; 2023 Nov; 54 Suppl 6():110724. PubMed ID: 38143142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility of classifications for olecranon fractures.
Tamaoki MJ; Matsunaga FT; Silveira JD; Balbachevsky D; Matsumoto MH; Belloti JC
Injury; 2014 Nov; 45 Suppl 5():S18-20. PubMed ID: 25528618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of a three-dimensional classification system for intertrochanteric fracture using computed tomography.
Wada K; Mikami H; Toki S; Amari R; Takai M; Sairyo K
Injury; 2020 Nov; 51(11):2682-2685. PubMed ID: 32718752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The reliability of a Garden, AO and simple II stage classifications for intracapsular hip fractures.
Masionis P; Uvarovas V; Mazarevičius G; Popov K; Venckus Š; Baužys K; Porvaneckas N
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Feb; 105(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 30639032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are classifications of proximal radius fractures reproducible?
Matsunaga FT; Tamaoki MJ; Cordeiro EF; Uehara A; Ikawa MH; Matsumoto MH; dos Santos JB; Belloti JC
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2009 Oct; 10():120. PubMed ID: 19793401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evans' classification of trochanteric fractures: an assessment of the interobserver and intraobserver reliability.
Andersen E; Jørgensen LG; Hededam LT
Injury; 1990 Nov; 21(6):377-8. PubMed ID: 2276801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Classification of intertrochanteric fractures with computed tomography: a study of intraobserver and interobserver variability and prognostic value.
Chapman CB; Herrera MF; Binenbaum G; Schweppe M; Staron RB; Feldman F; Rosenwasser MP
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2003 Sep; 32(9):443-9. PubMed ID: 14560826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
