These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19906377)

  • 21. The skeletal response to matt and polished cemented femoral stems.
    Barker DS; Wang AW; Yeo MF; Nawana NS; Brumby SA; Pearcy MJ; Howie DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2000 Nov; 82(8):1182-8. PubMed ID: 11132284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using 'subcement' to simulate the long-term fatigue response of cemented femoral stems in a cadaver model: could a novel preclinical screening test have caught the Exeter matt problem?
    Race A; Miller MA; Mann KA
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(4):585-97. PubMed ID: 20476506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Measurement of transient and residual stresses during polymerization of bone cement for cemented hip implants.
    Nuño N; Madrala A; Plamondon D
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2605-11. PubMed ID: 18692188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radiographic and histologic analysis of cemented double tapered femoral stems.
    Brumby SA; Howie DW; Pearcy MJ; Wang AW; Nawana NS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):229-37. PubMed ID: 9917608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of surface roughness on stem-cement gaps.
    Race A; Miller MA; Ayers DC; Cleary RJ; Mann KA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2002 Nov; 84(8):1199-204. PubMed ID: 12463671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Modelling the fibrous tissue layer in cemented hip replacements: experimental and finite element methods.
    Waide V; Cristofolini L; Stolk J; Verdonschot N; Boogaard GJ; Toni A
    J Biomech; 2004 Jan; 37(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 14672564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microdamage accumulation in the cement layer of hip replacements under flexural loading.
    McCormack BA; Prendergast PJ
    J Biomech; 1999 May; 32(5):467-75. PubMed ID: 10327000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A three-dimensional non-linear finite element study of the effect of cement-prosthesis debonding in cemented femoral total hip components.
    Harrigan TP; Harris WH
    J Biomech; 1991; 24(11):1047-58. PubMed ID: 1761581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The importance of a thick cement mantle depends on stem geometry and stem-cement interfacial bonding.
    Caruana J; Janssen D; Verdonschot N; Blunn GW
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Apr; 223(3):315-27. PubMed ID: 19405437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stem-cement porosity may explain early loosening of cemented femoral hip components: experimental-computational in vitro study.
    Mann KA; Damron LA; Miller MA; Race A; Clarke MT; Cleary RJ
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Mar; 25(3):340-50. PubMed ID: 17149748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
    O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mechanical stability of total hip replacement using pressurization of bone cement during curing: push-out tests in cadaver femora.
    Apostolou CD; Yiannakopoulos CK; Ioannidis TT; Papagelopoulos PJ; Korres D
    Orthopedics; 2007 Dec; 30(12):1028-32. PubMed ID: 18198774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The load carrying and fatigue properties of the stem-cement interface with smooth and porous coated femoral components.
    Manley MT; Stern LS; Gurtowski J
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1985; 19(5):563-75. PubMed ID: 4066729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Experimental micromechanics of the cement-bone interface.
    Mann KA; Miller MA; Cleary RJ; Janssen D; Verdonschot N
    J Orthop Res; 2008 Jun; 26(6):872-9. PubMed ID: 18253965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative finite element analysis of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
    Pérez MA; Palacios J
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Jun; 38(6):2093-106. PubMed ID: 20232148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Vacuum-mixing cement does not decrease overall porosity in cemented femoral stems: an in vitro laboratory investigation.
    Messick KJ; Miller MA; Damron LA; Race A; Clarke MT; Mann KA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Aug; 89(8):1115-21. PubMed ID: 17785755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond.
    Mann KA; Bartel DL; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 1997 Sep; 15(5):700-6. PubMed ID: 9420599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Surface pretreatment for prolonged survival of cemented tibial prosthesis components: full- vs. surface-cementation technique.
    Marx R; Qunaibi M; Wirtz DC; Niethard FU; Mumme T
    Biomed Eng Online; 2005 Oct; 4():61. PubMed ID: 16262888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of bone cement type on production of fretting wear on the femoral stem surface: a preliminary study.
    Zhang HY; Blunt LA; Jiang XQ; Fleming LT; Barrans SM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Aug; 27(7):666-72. PubMed ID: 22459056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of stem length on mechanics of the femoral hip component after cemented revision.
    Mann KA; Ayers DC; Damron TA
    J Orthop Res; 1997 Jan; 15(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 9066528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.