These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19907723)

  • 1. Mechanical properties and three-body wear of dental restoratives and their comparative flowable materials.
    Schultz S; Rosentritt M; Behr M; Handel G
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Jan; 41(1):e1-10. PubMed ID: 19907723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of flowable bulk-fill and flowable resin-based composites: an in vitro analysis.
    Engelhardt F; Hahnel S; Preis V; Rosentritt M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):2123-2130. PubMed ID: 26745959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites.
    Kim KH; Ong JL; Okuno O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):642-9. PubMed ID: 12131887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDRâ„¢ technology.
    Ilie N; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2011 Apr; 27(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 21194743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins.
    Manhart J; Kunzelmann KH; Chen HY; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2000 Jan; 16(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 11203521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites.
    Leprince JG; Palin WM; Vanacker J; Sabbagh J; Devaux J; Leloup G
    J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):993-1000. PubMed ID: 24874951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wear and hardness of different core build-up materials.
    Schmage P; Nergiz I; Sito F; Platzer U; Rosentritt M
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2009 Oct; 91(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 19402146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical properties of new composite restorative materials.
    Manhart J; Kunzelmann KH; Chen HY; Hickel R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000; 53(4):353-61. PubMed ID: 10898876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro contact wear of dental composites.
    Nagarajan VS; Jahanmir S; Thompson VP
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jan; 20(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 14698775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wear behavior of new composite restoratives.
    Yap AU; Tan CH; Chung SM
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 15195726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture resistance of compomer and composite restoratives.
    Yap AU; Chung SM; Chow WS; Tsai KT; Lim CT
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 14753329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture toughness of nine flowable resin composites.
    Bonilla ED; Yashar M; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 12644801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of filler size and filler loading on wear of experimental flowable resin composites.
    Shinkai K; Taira Y; Suzuki S; Kawashima S; Suzuki M
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2018 Feb; 26():e20160652. PubMed ID: 29412366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative hardness and modulus of tooth-colored restoratives: a depth-sensing microindentation study.
    Yap AU; Wang X; Wu X; Chung SM
    Biomaterials; 2004 May; 25(11):2179-85. PubMed ID: 14741633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical properties of contemporary composite resins and their interrelations.
    Thomaidis S; Kakaboura A; Mueller WD; Zinelis S
    Dent Mater; 2013 Aug; 29(8):e132-41. PubMed ID: 23790281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wear and microhardness of different resin composite materials.
    Say EC; Civelek A; Nobecourt A; Ersoy M; Guleryuz C
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):628-34. PubMed ID: 14531611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tailoring of physical properties in highly filled experimental nanohybrid resin composites.
    Pick B; Pelka M; Belli R; Braga RR; Lohbauer U
    Dent Mater; 2011 Jul; 27(7):664-9. PubMed ID: 21514956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of artificial saliva on abrasive wear and microhardness of dental composites filled with nanoparticles.
    Mayworm CD; Camargo SS; Bastian FL
    J Dent; 2008 Sep; 36(9):703-10. PubMed ID: 18554772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the wear and flexural characteristics of flowable resin composites for posterior lesions.
    Sumino N; Tsubota K; Takamizawa T; Shiratsuchi K; Miyazaki M; Latta MA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013; 71(3-4):820-7. PubMed ID: 23638859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.