These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19907734)

  • 1. Quantitative assessment of orthodontic mini-implant displacement: the effect of initial force application.
    Holst AI; Karl M; Karolczak M; Goellner M; Holst S
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Jan; 41(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 19907734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computed tomographic characterization of mini-implant placement pattern and maximum anchorage force in human cadavers.
    Lemieux G; Hart A; Cheretakis C; Goodmurphy C; Trexler S; McGary C; Retrouvey JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 21889080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M; Yoshida T; Ono A; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 17974113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of bone quality, implant type, and implantation site preparation on insertion torques of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
    Wilmes B; Drescher D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(7):697-703. PubMed ID: 21458232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Insertion torque and success of orthodontic mini-implants: a systematic review.
    Meursinge Reynders RA; Ronchi L; Ladu L; van Etten-Jamaludin F; Bipat S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Nov; 142(5):596-614.e5. PubMed ID: 23116501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical indices for orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M
    J Oral Sci; 2011 Dec; 53(4):407-12. PubMed ID: 22167023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants of different lengths.
    Pithon MM; Figueiredo DS; Oliveira DD
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 71(3):479-86. PubMed ID: 23273488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bicortical vs monocortical orthodontic skeletal anchorage.
    Brettin BT; Grosland NM; Qian F; Southard KA; Stuntz TD; Morgan TA; Marshall SD; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 18984394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical stability assessment of novel orthodontic mini-implant designs: Part 2.
    Hong C; Truong P; Song HN; Wu BM; Moon W
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Nov; 81(6):1001-9. PubMed ID: 21714589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Insertion Torques of Self-Drilling Mini-Implants in Simulated Mandibular Bone: Assessment of Potential for Implant Fracture.
    Hosein YK; Smith A; Dunning CE; Tassi A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):e57-64. PubMed ID: 27183083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of size and insertion angle of orthodontic mini-implants on skeletal anchorage.
    Tatli U; Alraawi M; Toroğlu MS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):220-228. PubMed ID: 31375232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental evaluation of tooth movement in the beagle dog with the mini-screw implant for orthodontic anchorage.
    Owens SE; Buschang PH; Cope JB; Franco PF; Rossouw PE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):639-46. PubMed ID: 18005838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical applications of mini-implants as orthodontic anchorage and the peri-implant tissue reaction upon loading.
    Cho HJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2006 Oct; 34(10):813-20. PubMed ID: 17087396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.
    Wu TY; Kuang SH; Wu CH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1595-9. PubMed ID: 19615569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of mini-implant displacement using cone beam computed tomography.
    Alves M; Baratieri C; Nojima LI
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Oct; 22(10):1151-1156. PubMed ID: 21303419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why are mini-implants lost: the value of the implantation technique!
    Romano FL; Consolaro A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 25741821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predrilling of the implant site: Is it necessary for orthodontic mini-implants?
    Baumgaertel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jun; 137(6):825-9. PubMed ID: 20685539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of screw diameter on orthodontic skeletal anchorage.
    Morarend C; Qian F; Marshall SD; Southard KA; Grosland NM; Morgan TA; McManus M; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 19651352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant.
    Motoyoshi M; Hirabayashi M; Uemura M; Shimizu N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 16441792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems.
    Chen YJ; Chang HH; Huang CY; Hung HC; Lai EH; Yao CC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):768-75. PubMed ID: 17868386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.