These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19907906)

  • 1. Re-evaluation of animal numbers and costs for in vivo tests to accomplish REACH legislation requirements for chemicals - a report by the transatlantic think tank for toxicology (t(4)).
    Rovida C; Hartung T
    ALTEX; 2009; 26(3):187-208. PubMed ID: 19907906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Animal testing and alternative approaches for the human health risk assessment under the proposed new European chemicals regulation.
    Höfer T; Gerner I; Gundert-Remy U; Liebsch M; Schulte A; Spielmann H; Vogel R; Wettig K
    Arch Toxicol; 2004 Oct; 78(10):549-64. PubMed ID: 15170526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Introduction to the EU REACH legislation.
    Grindon C; Combes R
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():5-10. PubMed ID: 16555955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alternative test methods in inhalation toxicology: challenges and opportunities.
    Costa DL
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2008 Jun; 60(2-3):105-9. PubMed ID: 18486462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integrated decision-tree testing strategies for developmental and reproductive toxicity with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation.
    Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod JF
    Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Feb; 36(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 18333715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A review of the status of alternative approaches to animal testing and the development of integrated testing strategies for assessing the toxicity of chemicals under REACH--a summary of a DEFRA-funded project conducted by Liverpool John Moores University and FRAME.
    Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod J
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():149-58. PubMed ID: 16555968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The challenge of reproductive and developmental toxicology under REACH.
    Scialli AR
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Jul; 51(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 18490093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH).
    Lilienblum W; Dekant W; Foth H; Gebel T; Hengstler JG; Kahl R; Kramer PJ; Schweinfurth H; Wollin KM
    Arch Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 82(4):211-36. PubMed ID: 18322675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. REACH and reproductive and developmental toxicology: still questions.
    Scialli AR; Guikema AJ
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2012 Feb; 58(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 22239083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-testing approaches under REACH--help or hindrance? Perspectives from a practitioner within industry.
    Patlewicz G; Chen MW; Bellin CA
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2011 Mar; 22(1-2):67-88. PubMed ID: 21391142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrated decision-tree testing strategies for skin corrosion and irritation with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation.
    Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod JF
    Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Oct; 36 Suppl 1():65-74. PubMed ID: 19025332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The integrated project ReProTect: a novel approach in reproductive toxicity hazard assessment.
    Hareng L; Pellizzer C; Bremer S; Schwarz M; Hartung T
    Reprod Toxicol; 2005; 20(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 15899576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of EU risk assessments existing chemicals (EC Regulation 793/93).
    Bodar CW; Berthault F; de Bruijn JH; van Leeuwen CJ; Pronk ME; Vermeire TG
    Chemosphere; 2003 Dec; 53(8):1039-47. PubMed ID: 14505727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of the dog as non-rodent test species in the safety testing schedule associated with the registration of crop and plant protection products (pesticides): present status.
    Box RJ; Spielmann H
    Arch Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 79(11):615-26. PubMed ID: 15940470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concept of REACH and impact on evaluation of chemicals.
    Foth H; Hayes A
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Jan; 27(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 18480145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A discussion of the impact of US chemical regulation legislation on the field of toxicity testing.
    Sullivan K; Beck N; Sandusky C; Willett C
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Sep; 25(6):1231-6. PubMed ID: 21624455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Economic benefits of using adaptive predictive models of reproductive toxicity in the context of a tiered testing program.
    Martin MT; Knudsen TB; Judson RS; Kavlock RJ; Dix DJ
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2012 Feb; 58(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 22239076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strengths and limitations of using repeat-dose toxicity studies to predict effects on fertility.
    Dent MP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Aug; 48(3):241-58. PubMed ID: 17512650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Introduction to the EU REACH legislation.
    Grindon C; Combes R
    Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Oct; 36 Suppl 1():1-6. PubMed ID: 19025328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.