BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19908418)

  • 1. Influence of the positioning of a cementless glenoid prosthesis on its interface micromotions.
    Suárez DR; van der Linden JC; Valstar ER; Broomans P; Poort G; Rozing PM; van Keulen F
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Oct; 223(7):795-804. PubMed ID: 19908418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interface micromotions increase with less-conforming cementless glenoid components.
    Suárez DR; Nerkens W; Valstar ER; Rozing PM; van Keulen F
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2012 Apr; 21(4):474-82. PubMed ID: 21641827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of baseplate positioning on fixation of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Zhang M; Junaid S; Gregory T; Hansen U; Cheng CK
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Feb; 62():15-22. PubMed ID: 30658155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bone-cement interface of the glenoid component: stress analysis for varying cement thickness.
    Terrier A; Büchler P; Farron A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):710-7. PubMed ID: 15961203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of glenoid replacement prostheses: a comparison of keeled and pegged anchorage systems.
    Lacroix D; Murphy LA; Prendergast PJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2000 Aug; 122(4):430-6. PubMed ID: 11036568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: validation of a computer impingement model.
    Roche CP; Marczuk Y; Wright TW; Flurin PH; Grey SG; Jones RB; Routman HD; Gilot GJ; Zuckerman JD
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2013; 71(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 24344620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture risk and initial fixation of a cementless glenoid implant: the effect of numbers and types of screws.
    Suarez DR; Valstar ER; Rozing PM; van Keulen F
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Oct; 227(10):1058-66. PubMed ID: 23804951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone ingrowth simulation for a concept glenoid component design.
    Andreykiv A; Prendergast PJ; van Keulen F; Swieszkowski W; Rozing PM
    J Biomech; 2005 May; 38(5):1023-33. PubMed ID: 15797584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of glenoid component alignment variations on cement mantle stresses in total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Hopkins AR; Hansen UN; Amis AA; Emery R
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2004; 13(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 15570237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Posterior glenoid wear in total shoulder arthroplasty: eccentric anterior reaming is superior to posterior augment.
    Wang T; Abrams GD; Behn AW; Lindsey D; Giori N; Cheung EV
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3928-36. PubMed ID: 26242283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of reverse total shoulder joint forces and glenoid fixation.
    Kwon YW; Forman RE; Walker PS; Zuckerman JD
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2010; 68(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 21162705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of glenoid component design and humeral component retroversion on internal and external rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
    Berhouet J; Garaud P; Favard L
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 99(8):887-94. PubMed ID: 24211248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of rotator cuff dysfunction on the initial mechanical stability of cementless glenoid components.
    Suárez DR; Valstar ER; van der Linden JC; van Keulen F; Rozing PM
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2009 May; 47(5):507-14. PubMed ID: 19306029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of glenoid component inclination on its fixation and humeral head subluxation in total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Oosterom R; Rozing PM; Bersee HE
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Dec; 19(10):1000-8. PubMed ID: 15531049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of screw position on the initial fixation of a reverse total shoulder prosthesis in a glenoid with a cavitary bone defect.
    Codsi MJ; Iannotti JP
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2008; 17(3):479-86. PubMed ID: 18282725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 3D navigated implantation of the glenoid component in reversed shoulder arthroplasty. Feasibility and results in an anatomic study.
    Stübig T; Petri M; Zeckey C; Hawi N; Krettek C; Citak M; Meller R
    Int J Med Robot; 2013 Dec; 9(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 23908109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of glenohumeral conformity on glenoid stresses after total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Terrier A; Büchler P; Farron A
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2006; 15(4):515-20. PubMed ID: 16831660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acromion-fixation of glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Murphy LA; Prendergast PJ
    J Biomech; 2005 Aug; 38(8):1702-11. PubMed ID: 15958228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design and development of a computer assisted glenoid implantation technique for shoulder replacement surgery.
    Nguyen D; Ferreira LM; Brownhill JR; Faber KJ; Johnson JA
    Comput Aided Surg; 2007 May; 12(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 17538787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of bone impingement prediction in pre-operative planning for shoulder arthroplasty.
    Krekel PR; de Bruin PW; Valstar ER; Post FH; Rozing PM; Botha CP
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Oct; 223(7):813-22. PubMed ID: 19908420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.