147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19908922)
1. Swimming upstream: comparative effectiveness research in the US.
Greene JA
Pharmacoeconomics; 2009; 27(12):979-82. PubMed ID: 19908922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative effectiveness research: Promising area of study for pharmacists.
Clancy CM
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2010 Mar-Apr 1; 50(2):131-3. PubMed ID: 20199952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative effectiveness research stalls in the USA.
Webster PC
Lancet; 2010 Jan; 375(9712):361-2. PubMed ID: 20135825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Spending limited health care dollars on what works best: the promise of comparative effectiveness research.
Stein J
N C Med J; 2010; 71(3):265-6. PubMed ID: 20681501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A push for comparative effectiveness: US initiatives aim to empower patients, physicians. Interview by Bridget M. Kuehn.
Clancy CM
JAMA; 2012 Apr; 307(15):1570-1. PubMed ID: 22511672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative effectiveness research and the future practice of medicine.
Akhter MN; Levinson RA
J Natl Med Assoc; 2009 Dec; 101(12):1301-2. PubMed ID: 20070023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative effectiveness research: critically intertwined with health care reform and the future of biomedical innovation.
Murray RK; McElwee NE
Arch Intern Med; 2010 Apr; 170(7):596-9. PubMed ID: 20386002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative effectiveness research in the United States: a progress report.
Sullivan SD; Carlson JJ; Hansen RN
J Med Econ; 2013; 16(2):295-7. PubMed ID: 23227997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The promise and future of comparative effectiveness research.
Clancy CM
J Nurs Care Qual; 2010; 25(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 20010250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative effectiveness studies get big boost from health reform.
Carroll J
Manag Care; 2013 May; 22(5):27-8. PubMed ID: 23762914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. US healthcare reform: implications for health economics and outcomes research.
Chambers JD; Neumann PJ
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2010 Jun; 10(3):215-6. PubMed ID: 20545583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Facts, fallacies, and politics of comparative effectiveness research: Part I. Basic considerations.
Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Boswell MV; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2010; 13(1):E23-54. PubMed ID: 20119474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Futurescapes: evidence expectations in the USA for comparative effectiveness research for drugs in 2020.
Messner DA; Mohr P; Towse A
J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Aug; 4(4):385-400. PubMed ID: 25730709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative effectiveness, personalized medicine and innovation: the path forward.
Thomas A; Phillips A; Donnelly R; Piech CT
Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28(10):923-30. PubMed ID: 20831300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. US government kicks off program for comparative effectiveness research.
Mitka M
JAMA; 2010 Nov; 304(20):2230-1. PubMed ID: 21098764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The relevance of international studies to informed pharmacoeconomics and health policy decisions.
Lyles A
Clin Ther; 2010 Jan; 32(1):106-7. PubMed ID: 20171416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Health care reform and comparative effectiveness research in critical care medicine.
Au DH
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2011 Dec; 184(11):1219-20. PubMed ID: 22162878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Proposed new clinical trial system at NCI gets mixed reviews.
Nicholas J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Feb; 103(4):292-5. PubMed ID: 21303997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Making observational studies count: shaping the future of comparative effectiveness research.
Dreyer NA
Epidemiology; 2011 May; 22(3):295-7. PubMed ID: 21464648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. What does US$1.1 billion buy? An investment in the future.
Simpson LA
J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Nov; 3(6):561-3. PubMed ID: 25494559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
