BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19908923)

  • 1. Weighting must wait: incorporating equity concerns into cost-effectiveness analysis may take longer than expected.
    Wailoo A; Tsuchiya A; McCabe C
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2009; 27(12):983-9. PubMed ID: 19908923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Explicit incorporation of equity considerations into economic evaluation of public health interventions.
    Cookson R; Drummond M; Weatherly H
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2009 Apr; 4(Pt 2):231-45. PubMed ID: 19216834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficiency and equity considerations in the preferences of health policy-makers in Israel.
    Shmueli A; Golan O; Paolucci F; Mentzakis E
    Isr J Health Policy Res; 2017; 6():18. PubMed ID: 28373904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reconciliation of economic concerns and health policy: illustration of an equity adjustment procedure using proportional shortfall.
    Stolk EA; van Donselaar G; Brouwer WB; Busschbach JJ
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2004; 22(17):1097-107. PubMed ID: 15612829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can cost-effectiveness analysis integrate concerns for equity? Systematic review.
    Johri M; Norheim OF
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2012 Apr; 28(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 22494637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality-adjusted life-years. Ethical implications for physicians and policymakers.
    La Puma J; Lawlor EF
    JAMA; 1990 Jun; 263(21):2917-21. PubMed ID: 2110986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Societal preferences for distributive justice in the allocation of health care resources: a latent class discrete choice experiment.
    Skedgel C; Wailoo A; Akehurst R
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Jan; 35(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 25145575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Equity and efficiency preferences of health policy makers in China--a stated preference analysis.
    Paolucci F; Mentzakis E; Defechereux T; Niessen LW
    Health Policy Plan; 2015 Oct; 30(8):1059-66. PubMed ID: 25500745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inquiry into the relationship between equity weights and the value of the QALY.
    Bobinac A; van Exel NJ; Rutten FF; Brouwer WB
    Value Health; 2012 Dec; 15(8):1119-26. PubMed ID: 23244815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of QALY weights for QALY calculations: a review of industry submissions requesting listing on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme 2002-4.
    Scuffham PA; Whitty JA; Mitchell A; Viney R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(4):297-310. PubMed ID: 18370565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incorporating equity in economic evaluations: a multi-attribute equity state approach.
    Round J; Paulden M
    Eur J Health Econ; 2018 May; 19(4):489-498. PubMed ID: 28573333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
    McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Equity weights in the allocation of health care: the rank-dependent QALY model.
    Bleichrodt H; Diecidue E; Quiggin J
    J Health Econ; 2004 Jan; 23(1):157-71. PubMed ID: 15154692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of economic evaluations in NHS decision-making: a review and empirical investigation.
    Williams I; McIver S; Moore D; Bryan S
    Health Technol Assess; 2008 Apr; 12(7):iii, ix-x, 1-175. PubMed ID: 18373906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. QALYs and the equity-efficiency trade-off.
    Wagstaff A
    J Health Econ; 1991 May; 10(1):21-41. PubMed ID: 10113661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determining priority for liver transplantation: a comparison of cost per QALY and discrete choice experiment-generated public preferences.
    Ratcliffe J; Buxton M; Young T; Longworth L
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2005; 4(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 16466276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness analysis: from science to application.
    Berger ML; Teutsch S
    Med Care; 2005 Jul; 43(7 Suppl):49-53. PubMed ID: 16056009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Effectiveness Research Would Contribute More to Ethical Policy Making if Cost Were Considered.
    Frick KD
    AMA J Ethics; 2015 Jul; 17(7):651-5. PubMed ID: 26158813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Equity Weights for Socioeconomic Position: Two Methods-Survey of Stated Preferences and Epidemiological Data.
    Lal A; Mohebi M; Sweeney R; Moodie M; Peeters A; Carter R
    Value Health; 2019 Feb; 22(2):247-253. PubMed ID: 30711071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integrating social justice concerns into economic evaluation for healthcare and public health: A systematic review.
    Dukhanin V; Searle A; Zwerling A; Dowdy DW; Taylor HA; Merritt MW
    Soc Sci Med; 2018 Feb; 198():27-35. PubMed ID: 29274616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.