These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19909945)
1. When hearing the bark helps to identify the dog: semantically-congruent sounds modulate the identification of masked pictures. Chen YC; Spence C Cognition; 2010 Mar; 114(3):389-404. PubMed ID: 19909945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Crossmodal semantic priming by naturalistic sounds and spoken words enhances visual sensitivity. Chen YC; Spence C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1554-68. PubMed ID: 21688942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The time-course of the cross-modal semantic modulation of visual picture processing by naturalistic sounds and spoken words. Chen YC; Spence C Multisens Res; 2013; 26(4):371-86. PubMed ID: 24319929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Audiovisual semantic interference and attention: evidence from the attentional blink paradigm. Van der Burg E; Brederoo SG; Nieuwenstein MR; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jun; 134(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 20176341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Semantics and the multisensory brain: how meaning modulates processes of audio-visual integration. Doehrmann O; Naumer MJ Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():136-50. PubMed ID: 18479672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What do graded effects of semantic transparency reveal about morphological processing? Feldman LB; Soltano EG; Pastizzo MJ; Francis SE Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):17-30. PubMed ID: 15172521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dissociating the time courses of the cross-modal semantic priming effects elicited by naturalistic sounds and spoken words. Chen YC; Spence C Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28600716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The crossmodal facilitation of visual object representations by sound: evidence from the backward masking paradigm. Chen YC; Spence C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1784-802. PubMed ID: 21942418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Top-down task effects overrule automatic multisensory responses to letter-sound pairs in auditory association cortex. van Atteveldt NM; Formisano E; Goebel R; Blomert L Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1345-60. PubMed ID: 17513133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Semantic priming and repetition priming from masked words: evidence for a center-surround attentional mechanism in perceptual recognition. Carr TH; Dagenbach D J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Mar; 16(2):341-50. PubMed ID: 2137871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. School-aged children can benefit from audiovisual semantic congruency during memory encoding. Heikkilä J; Tiippana K Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1199-207. PubMed ID: 26048162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The sensory nature of knowledge: Sensory priming effects in semantic categorization. Brunel L; Lesourd M; Labeye E; Versace R Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):955-64. PubMed ID: 19787552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repetition priming for multisensory stimuli: task-irrelevant and task-relevant stimuli are associated if semantically related but with no advantage over uni-sensory stimuli. Hecht D; Reiner M; Karni A Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1251():236-44. PubMed ID: 19022232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of multisensory memories in unisensory object discrimination. Lehmann S; Murray MM Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 24(2):326-34. PubMed ID: 15993770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: the role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing. Parmentier FB Cognition; 2008 Dec; 109(3):345-62. PubMed ID: 19007926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]